Full Text
Translation output
R.S.A. No.221/2003 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
R.S.A. NO.221/2003
Date of Decision: 22nd March, 2013
JAI PAL …… Appellants
Through: Counsel for the appellant (appearance not given).
R.S.A. NO.221/2003
Date of Decision: 22nd March, 2013
JAI PAL …… Appellants
Through: Counsel for the appellant (appearance not given).
VERSUS
UOI …… Respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
V.K. SHALI, J. (Oral)
Review Petition No.173/13 & CM. No.5081/13
V.K. SHALI, J. (Oral)
Review Petition No.173/13 & CM. No.5081/13
JUDGMENT
1. This is an application for reviewing order dated 7th February, 2013.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. I have also gone through the impugned order. Since the learned counsel for the appellant has failed to show any error apparent on the face of record in the impugned order, therefore, the application for review of order dated 7th February, 2013 is rejected. Since the review application has been rejected, the stay application is also dismissed. V.K. SHALI, J. MARCH 22, 2013 ss