Full Text
Translation output
$-40 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1386/2013
KRISHNA KUMAR SONA & ORS. Petitioners
Through Mr. S. Ali, Adv.
CRL.M.C. 1386/2013
KRISHNA KUMAR SONA & ORS. Petitioners
Through Mr. S. Ali, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI 8c ANR.
Respondent
Through Mr. Naveen Sharma, APP for State.
SI Rajni.
Counsel for the respondentno.2.
Respondent
Through Mr. Naveen Sharma, APP for State.
SI Rajni.
Counsel for the respondentno.2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR
10.04.2013 By this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 72/2011, registered under Sections 406/498A/34
IPG at P.S. Nanlcpura, New Delhi and the criminal proceedings arising therefrom.
At the outset counsel for respondent no.2 has drawn the attention of this court to the high handedness of the petitioner no.l who had gone to the house of her aunt yesterday and hurled filthy abuses against her. The respondent no.2 thus prays that at least direction be given to the petitioner no.l not to indulge in such kind of act, once an amicable settlement is arrived at between the parties.
2013:DHC:7334 Counsel for the petitioner no.l on the other hand submits that petitioner No. 1 met the son of the sister of aunt of respondent no.2 and during the said meeting scorching arguments were exchanged. The petitioner no.l, however, undertakes that he will not repeat such an act again with any of the family members ofthe respondent no.2
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are not present in the court as they are residing at Garhwal, Uttralchand and are very old and aged persons. Counsel prays that their presence be exempted.
The petitioner nos. 1, 4 to 7 and the respondent no.2 are present in the court along with their respective counsels. They are duly identified through their respective counsels.
Counsels for the parties submit that all the inter se disputes between the parties have been amicably settled due to the intervention of
Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. Counsels further submit that in terms of the said settlement, the petitioner no.l has agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 6 lacs to the respondent no.2 towards full and final settlement of all her material claims inclusive of stridhan, maintenance(past, present and future), permanent alimony etc. Counsels f state that out of the said amount of Rs. 6 lacs, the petitioner no.l has already paid an amount of Rs.4 lacs to the respondent no.2. The counsel for the petitioners has paid, the balance amount of Rs.2 lacs by way of demand draft to the respondent no.2 today in court. Counsel also submits that the marriage between the petitioner no.l and the respondent no.2 has already-been dissolved vide
10.04.2013 By this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 72/2011, registered under Sections 406/498A/34
IPG at P.S. Nanlcpura, New Delhi and the criminal proceedings arising therefrom.
At the outset counsel for respondent no.2 has drawn the attention of this court to the high handedness of the petitioner no.l who had gone to the house of her aunt yesterday and hurled filthy abuses against her. The respondent no.2 thus prays that at least direction be given to the petitioner no.l not to indulge in such kind of act, once an amicable settlement is arrived at between the parties.
2013:DHC:7334 Counsel for the petitioner no.l on the other hand submits that petitioner No. 1 met the son of the sister of aunt of respondent no.2 and during the said meeting scorching arguments were exchanged. The petitioner no.l, however, undertakes that he will not repeat such an act again with any of the family members ofthe respondent no.2
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are not present in the court as they are residing at Garhwal, Uttralchand and are very old and aged persons. Counsel prays that their presence be exempted.
The petitioner nos. 1, 4 to 7 and the respondent no.2 are present in the court along with their respective counsels. They are duly identified through their respective counsels.
Counsels for the parties submit that all the inter se disputes between the parties have been amicably settled due to the intervention of
Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. Counsels further submit that in terms of the said settlement, the petitioner no.l has agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 6 lacs to the respondent no.2 towards full and final settlement of all her material claims inclusive of stridhan, maintenance(past, present and future), permanent alimony etc. Counsels f state that out of the said amount of Rs. 6 lacs, the petitioner no.l has already paid an amount of Rs.4 lacs to the respondent no.2. The counsel for the petitioners has paid, the balance amount of Rs.2 lacs by way of demand draft to the respondent no.2 today in court. Counsel also submits that the marriage between the petitioner no.l and the respondent no.2 has already-been dissolved vide
ORDER
and decree dated 7.2.2013.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
Since the inter se disputes between the parties have been amicably settled and the marriage between the petitioner no.l and the respondent no.2 has already been dissolved, I am of the view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the said FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom against the petitioners alive any frirther. Consequently
FIR No. 72/2011, registered under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC at P.S.
Nankpura, New Delhi and the criminal proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
KAILASH GAMBfflR, J APRIL 10,2013/mg
I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
Since the inter se disputes between the parties have been amicably settled and the marriage between the petitioner no.l and the respondent no.2 has already been dissolved, I am of the view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the said FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom against the petitioners alive any frirther. Consequently
FIR No. 72/2011, registered under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC at P.S.
Nankpura, New Delhi and the criminal proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
KAILASH GAMBfflR, J APRIL 10,2013/mg