Full Text
Translation output
i ^ > HIGH COURT-OF DELHI AT NEW- DELHI -:..e.USAA 7/2011: , ' . . .
DILI? MEHTA Appellant
Through: Mr.C.Hari Shankar, Advocate.
DILI? MEHTA Appellant
Through: Mr.C.Hari Shankar, Advocate.
VERSUS
COMMISSIGNER OF CUSTOMS .... Respondents
Through; Mr.Kamal Nijhawan; Senior Standmg Counsel along with Mr.Sumit Gaur, Advocate.
Through; Mr.Kamal Nijhawan; Senior Standmg Counsel along with Mr.Sumit Gaur, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. .TUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAl^
12.04.2013 CM No. 4074/2011 (for condonation of delay of 165 days in filing)
The delay is condoned.
CM No. 4073/2011 (stay) ^ In view of the order passed in CUSAA N((^2010 in Basudev Garg
Vs. CommissionerofCustoms and CUSAA No. 10/2010in Arun Gupta Vs.
Commissioner of Customs and other connected matters today itscll, this appeal is allowed.
The impugned order has also been set aside and the matter is remitted
2013:DHC:6661-DB to the Tribunal for considering the same afresh. The same direction applies to this appeal also.
APRIL 12, 2013 ss BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J R.V.EASWAR, J h </y
0^- cfJ-4- $--41 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CM 7203/2013 in CUSAA 7/2011
DILIP MEHTA Appellant
Through: Mr J.S. Sinha, Mr Vikas Malhotra, Mr
M.P. Sahay, Advocates.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAl^
12.04.2013 CM No. 4074/2011 (for condonation of delay of 165 days in filing)
The delay is condoned.
CM No. 4073/2011 (stay) ^ In view of the order passed in CUSAA N((^2010 in Basudev Garg
Vs. CommissionerofCustoms and CUSAA No. 10/2010in Arun Gupta Vs.
Commissioner of Customs and other connected matters today itscll, this appeal is allowed.
The impugned order has also been set aside and the matter is remitted
2013:DHC:6661-DB to the Tribunal for considering the same afresh. The same direction applies to this appeal also.
APRIL 12, 2013 ss BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J R.V.EASWAR, J h </y
0^- cfJ-4- $--41 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CM 7203/2013 in CUSAA 7/2011
DILIP MEHTA Appellant
Through: Mr J.S. Sinha, Mr Vikas Malhotra, Mr
M.P. Sahay, Advocates.
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS Respondent
Through: MrKamal Nijhawan, Sr. Standing counsel.
♦ CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
06.05.2013 This is an application seeking correction in the order dated 12.04.2013.
The appearance on behalf ofthe appellant has been shown incorrectly. As per the application, it is MrJ.S. Sinha, Mr Vikas Malhotra and Mr M.P. Sahai; Advocates who had appeared on behalfofthe appellant and not Mr C. Harishankar, Advocate
^ who had appeared in the connected matters. There is no objection to this
; ^ correction being carried out by .the learned counsel for the respondents.
^ Consequently, the order dated 12.04.2013 shouldread as though suchpersons had appeared for the appellant and not Mr C. Harishankar, Advocate. This application stands disposed of.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J MAY 06, 2013 su/rk
Through: MrKamal Nijhawan, Sr. Standing counsel.
♦ CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
06.05.2013 This is an application seeking correction in the order dated 12.04.2013.
The appearance on behalf ofthe appellant has been shown incorrectly. As per the application, it is MrJ.S. Sinha, Mr Vikas Malhotra and Mr M.P. Sahai; Advocates who had appeared on behalfofthe appellant and not Mr C. Harishankar, Advocate
^ who had appeared in the connected matters. There is no objection to this
; ^ correction being carried out by .the learned counsel for the respondents.
^ Consequently, the order dated 12.04.2013 shouldread as though suchpersons had appeared for the appellant and not Mr C. Harishankar, Advocate. This application stands disposed of.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J VIBHU BAKHRU, J MAY 06, 2013 su/rk
JUDGMENT