Jaspal Singh v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 17 Apr 2013 · 2013:DHC:7780
V.K. Jain
W.P(C) No.2457/2013
2013:DHC:7780
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent authority to treat the petitioner’s writ petition as a representation and decide it as per applicable policy within a stipulated timeframe, disposing of the petition accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
$-43 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P(C) No.2457/2013 JASPAL SINGH ...... Petitioner
Through: Mr S.A. Saud and Mr Milan Lasker, Advocates
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent
CORAM:
Through: Mr. Varun Gupta with Ms Sonia Arora, Adv. for R-2/GNCTD
Mr Ajay Verma, Adv. for DDA Mr. Karan Bindra, Central Govt.
Counsel for R-1 and 5.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN
/o , 17.04.2013 After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to treat the writ petition as a representation, consider the same as per the appropriate applicable policy and take a decision thereon.
Accordingly the respondent no.3-Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement
Board Punarwas Bhawan, Vikas Kutir, Delhi, which according to the counsel for the petitioner is the appropriate authority, is directed to treat this petition as a representation, consider the same as per applicable policy, and take a decision thereon within a period of 12 weeks from today. The decision so taken would be communicated to the petitioner within four weeks thereafter.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
APRIL 17,2013 rd 2013:DHC:7780
JUDGMENT