Full Text
Translation output
I
$-40 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(Crl.) 686/2013 PRAMOD KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr.A Rao, Advocate
$-40 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(Crl.) 686/2013 PRAMOD KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr.A Rao, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE(G.N.C.T.) OF DELHI Respondent
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Ms. Richa Sharma and Mohd.
Adnan, Advocates with SI K.P.
Singh
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Ms. Richa Sharma and Mohd.
Adnan, Advocates with SI K.P.
Singh
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
01.05.2013 Notice.
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) accepts notice for respondent-State and points out that petitioner has already availed of furlough in this year and so, he is not entitledto parole.
In view of aforesaid, this petition is dismissed with liberty to petitioner to apply for parole after a period of one year from 16^^
February, 2013.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
MAY 01, 2013 s 2013:DHC:8083
01.05.2013 Notice.
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) accepts notice for respondent-State and points out that petitioner has already availed of furlough in this year and so, he is not entitledto parole.
In view of aforesaid, this petition is dismissed with liberty to petitioner to apply for parole after a period of one year from 16^^
February, 2013.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
MAY 01, 2013 s 2013:DHC:8083
JUDGMENT