Narender Alias Pappu v. State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi)

Delhi High Court · 01 May 2013 · 2013:DHC:8080
Sunil Gaur
W.P.(Crl.) 680/2013
2013:DHC:8080
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a prisoner with prior peaceful parole and good conduct, holding that mere apprehension without evidence is insufficient to deny parole.

Full Text
Translation output
$-38 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(Crl.) 680/2013 NARENDER ALIAS PAPPU Petitioner
Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey and Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE (G.N.C.T. OF DELHI) Respondent
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Ms. Richa Sharma and Mohd.
Adnan, Advocates with SI Krishan Kumar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
01.05.2013 Impugned order of7^ April, 2013 declines parole to petitioner on the apprehension of disturbance of law and order and of petitioner jumping parole.
Notice.
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), accepts notice on behalfofrespondent-State.
Nominal roll of petitioner indicates that petitioner had earlier also peacefully availed of parole last year and his conduct in jail has been satisfactory.
In view thereof, this petition is allowed and petitioner is granted
W.P.(Crl.) 680/2013 Page I 2013:DHC:8080 four weeks' parole subject to petitioner furnishingbail bond in the sum of
?20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent.
With aforesaidobservations, this petition is disposedof
Petitioner be apprised of this order forthwith by the concerned Jail
Superintendent.
MAY 01,2013 s W.P.(Crl.) 680/2013 (SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
Page 2 2013:DHC:8080
JUDGMENT