NATCO PHARMA LIMITED v. SUGEN INC. & ORS

Delhi High Court · 01 May 2013 · 2013:DHC:7285-DB
Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao
FAO(OS) 222/2013 & FAO(OS) 223/2013
2013:DHC:7285-DB
civil appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw civil appeals with liberty to file fresh appeals and dismissed the current appeals as not pressed.

Full Text
Translation output
$-26 & 27 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO(OS) 222/2013
NATCO PHARMA LIMITED Represented by:
Appellant Mr.C.Mukund, Advocate with Ms.Firdause Qutbwani andMs.Ekta
Bhasin, Advocates SUGEN INC. & ORS
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.T.R-Andhyanjma, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Praveen Anand and
Mr.Aditya Gupta, Advocates
FAO(OS) 223/2013
NATCO PHARMA LIMITED Appellant Mr.Abhishek Manu Singhavi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.C.Mukund and
Ms.Firdause Qutbwani, Advocates SUGEN INC& ORS
VERSUS
Respondents Mr.T.R.Andhyanjma, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Praveen Anand and
Mr.Aditya Gupta, Advocates for respondents/caveator ^
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
01.05.2013 2013:DHC:7285-DB »- Caveat 403/2013 in FAQ (OS) 223/2013
Since the caveator has appeared, hence the caveat is discharged.
FAQ rOS) Nos.222/2013 & 223/2013 With respect to the prayers made, grounds urged and other errors, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with right reserved to file fresh appeal on the cause impugned. Liberty granted as prayed for.
The appeals are dismissed as notpressed.
CMNos.6952-54/2013 in FAQ (OS) 222/2013 CMNos.6955-56/2013 in FAQ TPS) 223/2013
Applications are disposed of asinfructuous.
PRADEEP^AN^^JOG,J. V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.
MAY 01, 2013 mamta 2013:DHC:7285-DB
JUDGMENT