Sonu @ Kana v. State

Delhi High Court · 20 May 2013 · 2013:DHC:8254
Sunil Gaur
TR.P.(CRL.) 18/2013
2013:DHC:8254
criminal other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed that charge-sheets arising from the same FIR be tried by the same court to ensure consistency and disposed of the petition with appropriate case assignment directions.

Full Text
Translation output
>k. r/ $-30 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TR.P.(CRL.) 18/2013
SONU @ KANA Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajni Kant, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
08.05.2013 Crl.M.A. No.5729/2013 (Exemption)
Allowed subjectto alljust exceptions.
TR.P.fCI^.) 18/2013 Upon notice, Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for
Respondent-State, fairly submits that since both the charge-sheets rehte to the same FIRNo.230/2011, therefore, theyhaveto be tried by one court.
In view of stand taken as aforesaid, this petition is disposed of with direction that the charge-sheet filed against accused-Devewder Kumar in
Sessions case No.92/2012 be assigned to the court of concerned Additional
Sessions Judge, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.
With aforesaid directions,this petition is disposed of.
(SUNIL GAUR)
Judge MAY 08,2013 2013:DHC:8254 \ i $-20 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TR.P.(CRL.) 18/2013
SONU @KANA Petitioner
Through: Mr. RajniKant, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through; Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
20.05.2013 Crl.M.A.No.8202/2013 Notice.
Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalfofrespondent-State. f Forthe reasons stated inthe application, it is allowed andFIRnumber as well as parties' name mentioned in order of 8^ May, 2013 be read as under:
"FIR No. 236/2012 State V. Govind @ Judi". , With aforesaid observations, the application stands disposed of.
Dasti.
MAY 20,2013 vn (SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
2013:DHC:8254
JUDGMENT