Naresh Kumar @ Babli & Ors. v. State & Anr

2013. Gounsel for the parties also submit that both the parties are related to each other besides being neighbours. Gounsel for the parties submit that in view ofthe settlement, both the parties have taken a decision not to indulge into any such kind of fight in future and maintain complete peace and harmony in the vicinitywherethey are residing. Based on the above submissions, counsel for the parties pray that this Court may quash both the said FIRs which have arisen out of the same incident. Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State submits that there are serious allegations against Mr. Naresh Kumar who is accused in FIR No. 448/07 as he attacked the complainant with a knife and similarly there are serious allegations against Mr. Satinder, who is accused in FIR No. 450/07. Heard. Taking into consideration the said settlement having arrived at bet\\^een the parties and that both the parties are neighbours and are in fact close relatives, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the said FIRs and the proceedings arising therefrom unnecessarily alive any further against the petitioners. Consequently, FIR No. 448/07 registered under Sections 307/34 IPC at PS Vasant Kunj and FIR No. 450/07 registered under Sections 341/324/34 IPC at PS Vasant Kunj and the criminal proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. However, the aforesaid quashing qua Naresh Kumar and Satinder is subject to deposit of costs of Rs. 10,000/- by each with the Saket Bar Association within a period ofthree weeks from the date ofthis order. The present petitions stand disposed ofaccordingly. r\ MAY 22,2013 rkr KAILASH GAMBHIR, J