Uma Khullar v. Reino Industrial Organics Pvt Ltd

Delhi High Court · 24 May 2013 · 2013:DHC:8550
S. Muralidhar
Co.Pet. No. 59 of 2012
2013:DHC:8550
civil settled

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of three connected petitions upon a court-recorded settlement involving payment of Rs. 16 lakhs by the respondent, with provisions for revival and contempt in case of default.

Full Text
Translation output
t6 $- HIGH COURT OF DELHI aa JJ.
CO.PET. No. 59 of 20L2 UMA KHULLAR ..... Petitioner
Through: IVIr. S.S. Jauhar, Advocate.
34.
VERSUS
REINO INDUSTRIAL ORGANICS PVT LTD ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Kishore M. Gajaria with Mr. Piyush Sachdeva, Advocates with Mrs. Vibha Kapur and
Mr. Anil Kapur, Directors.
WITH..!O.PET. No. 60 of 2012 MULK RAJ KHULLAR .... Petitioner
Through: NIr. S.S. Jauhar, Advocate.
VERSUS
LTD ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Kishore M. Gajaria with Mr. Piyush Ntr. Anil Kapur, Directors.
AI\D 35.
Co. Pet Nos.59,60 & 61 of2012 CO.PET. No. 61 of 2012
Page I of3 2013:DHC:8550 t> o NITAN KHULLAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.S. Jauhar, Advocate.
VERSUS
LTD
Through: Mr. Kishore M. c"j"ri";ff flffittlr*
N4r. Anil Kapur, Directors.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MTIRALIDHAR
24.05.2013
ORDER

1. Statements have been made in Courttoday by the two Directors of the Respondent, Mrs. Vibha Kapur and Mr. Anil Kapur. The statements are placed below this order. In terms thereof the Petitioners have agreed to settle their claims in all the three petitions by accepting an aggregate payment of Rs.16 lakhs, which sum will be paid to them by the Respondents not later than 10m August 2013. with the aforementioned payment, there will be no further claims by the Petitioners in these petitions. If.there is any default in making payment as undertaken before the Court, it will be open to the Petitioners to revive these petitions and also institute proceedings for contempt of Court against the Respondent and the two Directors who have Co. PeL Nos. 59,60 & 61 of2012 t/ made statements on oath today in Court.

2. The right of the Respondent to institute any other proceedings in accordance with law against the Petitioners and the right of the Petitioners to defend themselves in such proceedings is reserved.

3. The petitions are disposed of in the above terms.

4. Order dasti.

S. MURALIDHAR, J