Kanika Mittal v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board

Delhi High Court · 21 Jun 2013 · 2013:DHC:7794
Sanjeev Sachdeva
W.P.(C) 4000/2013
2013:DHC:7794
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as the respondent had already taken action to include the petitioner in the eligible list for recruitment, thereby redressing her grievance.

Full Text
Translation output
•-·
), ~'

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 4000/2013 o/o
KANIKA MITTAL ..... Petitioner .Through: Mr.Sandeep Jindal, Advocate
VERSUS
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Pulkit Aggarwal, proxy counsel for Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate
CORAM: .
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
21.06.2013 CM No. 7450/2013 Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 4000/2013 & C.M.No.7449/2013 (for ex-parte ad interim relieD
By the present petition, the petitioner has sought direction to the respondent to consider the representation dated 8.3.2013 to allow the petitioner to participate in the recruitment/examination process against the registration application no.150198 for post code 70/90 invited vide advertisement no.004/2009. The respondent has placed on record an order of the Deputy Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi dated 20.6.2013 to show that necessary action has been taken to enlist the name of the· petitioner in the eligible list.
2013:DHC:7794 . ;:~­ /

In view of this, the grievance of the petitioner is redressed. No order is called for.
The petition is disposed of.
JUNE 21, 2013 rb ~~_}.~ SjEEV SACHDEVA, J.
(VACATION JUDGE)
2013:DHC:7794
JUDGMENT