Full Text
Translation output
>:4 (^) i j> HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 550/2013
RAJU SAWANT
Through:
BAIL APPLN. 550/2013
RAJU SAWANT
Through:
VERSUS
STATE
Through;
Petitioner Mr. Manish Kumar Saryal & Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates
Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State with SI Amarpreet
Through;
Petitioner Mr. Manish Kumar Saryal & Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates
Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State with SI Amarpreet
BAIT. APPLN. 706/2013
KARTAR SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Saryal & Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates
KARTAR SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Saryal & Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State with SI Amarpreet
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State with SI Amarpreet
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
08.07.2013 Petitioners' in the above-captioned two petitions, claiming to be
Collection Agent ofMs Asija Security Pvt. Ltd. &Rachit Financial Pvt
Ltd., are seeking regular bail in FIR No. 16/2013, registered under
Sections 420/406/468/471/506/34 r/w Sec. 120B of the IPG, at police station Jahangirpuri, Delhi.
BailApplication No. 550/2013 BailApplication No. 706/2013
Page 1 2013:DHC:6866 ' -it t While entertaining these applications, petitioners were directed to join the investigation. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that petitioners have joined the investigation but out of four TCRs, only one has been recovered and the remaining three
TCRs could not be recovered from the addresses furnished by the petitioners.
Considering the status report filed, the stand of petitioners, as disclosed in Annexures P-14 &; P-17, and without commenting on the merits ofthis case, interim orders of 5"^ April, 2013 (in Bail Application
^ No.550/2013) and 29^ April, 2013 (in Bail Application No. 706/2013) are made absolute. Let petitioners join the investigation of this case as and when called by notice in writing. In the event of arrest, petitioners-
Raju Sawant, son ofShri H.S.Sawant and Kartar Singh, son ofShri Khem
Chand be admitted to bail on their furnishing bail bond in the sum of
?30,000/- with one surety each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/ Arresting Officer.
Needless to say that if petitioners do not join and cooperate with the investigation ofthis case, then respondent-State would be at liberty to get this order revoked.
^ Above captioned two applications are disposed of with aforesaid directions.
JULY 08, 2013 r JNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
BailApplication No. 550/2013 Page2 BailApplication No. 706/2013
2013:DHC:6866
08.07.2013 Petitioners' in the above-captioned two petitions, claiming to be
Collection Agent ofMs Asija Security Pvt. Ltd. &Rachit Financial Pvt
Ltd., are seeking regular bail in FIR No. 16/2013, registered under
Sections 420/406/468/471/506/34 r/w Sec. 120B of the IPG, at police station Jahangirpuri, Delhi.
BailApplication No. 550/2013 BailApplication No. 706/2013
Page 1 2013:DHC:6866 ' -it t While entertaining these applications, petitioners were directed to join the investigation. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that petitioners have joined the investigation but out of four TCRs, only one has been recovered and the remaining three
TCRs could not be recovered from the addresses furnished by the petitioners.
Considering the status report filed, the stand of petitioners, as disclosed in Annexures P-14 &; P-17, and without commenting on the merits ofthis case, interim orders of 5"^ April, 2013 (in Bail Application
^ No.550/2013) and 29^ April, 2013 (in Bail Application No. 706/2013) are made absolute. Let petitioners join the investigation of this case as and when called by notice in writing. In the event of arrest, petitioners-
Raju Sawant, son ofShri H.S.Sawant and Kartar Singh, son ofShri Khem
Chand be admitted to bail on their furnishing bail bond in the sum of
?30,000/- with one surety each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/ Arresting Officer.
Needless to say that if petitioners do not join and cooperate with the investigation ofthis case, then respondent-State would be at liberty to get this order revoked.
^ Above captioned two applications are disposed of with aforesaid directions.
JULY 08, 2013 r JNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
BailApplication No. 550/2013 Page2 BailApplication No. 706/2013
2013:DHC:6866
JUDGMENT