Open Solutions LLC v. Birlasoft Inc.

Delhi High Court · 15 Sep 2013 · 2013:DHC:8436
S. Muralidhar
O.M.P. No. 664 of 2013
2013:DHC:8436
civil petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition to issue a Commission for recording evidence in India pursuant to a Letter of Request from a US court under the Hague Convention, directing compliance with procedural safeguards.

Full Text
Translation output
I '
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
O.M.P.No.664of2013 OPEN SOLUTIONS LLC Petitioner
Through: Ms. Jasleen Oberoi with Ms. Surbhi Mehta, Advoeates.
VERSUS
BIRLASOFTINC Respondent
Through: Mr. Atul Shankar Mathur with Ms. Shruti Yerma, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
09.07.2013
ORDER

1. This is a petition filed by the Petitioner under Section 78 read with Order XXVI Rules 19 and 20 (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 ('CPC) praying that a Commission be issued to give effect to the Letter of Request ('LOR') dated 13^ May 2013 issued by the Connecticut State Superior Court ('CSSC'), Judicial District of Hartford, Complex Litigation Docket, which is at pages 2 to 20 ofthe documents.

2. The LOR dated 13^ May 2013 has been made by the CSSC in an action initiated by the Petitioner, Open Solutions Inc., against the Respondent, Birlasoft Inc., in conformity with Article 3ofthe Hague Convention of18^ May 1970 regarding 'Taking Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters'. The LOR is for recording the evidence of one of the witnesses mentioned in Appendix A at Clause (e), i.e., Mr. Sanjay Gupta, who was OMPNo. 664 of2013 Page 1 of[4] 2013:DHC:8436 \ formerly employed with the Defendant and who is residing at A-703, Vardhman Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase-1, New Delhi - 110 091 (India).

3. Learned counsel for the Respondent states that he will be filing his vakalatnama within two weeks from today. He states that as already agreed between the parties, the Respondent has no objection to the Petitioner's request being granted.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the place for recording the deposition of the witness in Delhi has been set out in Clause (a) of para 13 of the LOR. Learned counsel further points out that in terms of the LOR, the recording of evidence may be „completed by 15 September 2013. Learned counsel for the parties state that they have agreed that the convenient dates for recording the deposition of the witness in question are between \9^ and 26'*' August 2013.

6. Accordingly, this Court appoints Ms. Amrita Sharma, Advocate (Mobile No. 9899094937) as Court Commissioner ('CC') to execute the commission for recording of the deposition of Mr. Sanjay Gupta. His examinatiori-inchief is to be conducted by the Petitioner, as he has been cited as a witness by the Petitioner. His cross-examination will be by the^Respondent. The CC will issue summons to the witness, Mr. Sanjay Gupta, through the Registry- OMP No. 664 of2013 Page 2 of[4] I I M ofthis Court for which the process will be deposited by the Petitioner within one week. The CC will be provided with a complete set of the papers, including the documents filed by the Petitioner comprising the LOR and order ofthe CSSC.

7. The CC will endeavour to commence the recording of deposition of witness on 21®^ August 2013 and complete itnot later than 26^ August 2013. If there is any change required in the above dates, the parties will inform the CC at least one week in advance. The CC will be given full cooperation by the parties. He shall abide by the procedure as set out by the CSSC in the LOR and accompanying documents. The CC will deposit with the Registrar of this Court the complete transcript of the evidence of the witness in a sealed cover within three days of the completion of the exercise. The said sealed cover will be properly labelled and endorsed by the CC with the signature and date. The said sealed cover will be dispatched to the Connecticut State Superior Court, Judicial District of Hartford, Complex Litigation Docket, 95, Washington Street, Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, USA by the Registry through an approved international courier, the costs for which will be borne by the Petitioner. The tracking report evidencing the delivery ofthe packet to the concerned Court will be placed on record.

8. The fees of the CC is fixed at Rs. 1 lakh which will be paid to her by the Petitioner within four weeks from today. This is independent ofthe expenses OMP No. 664 of2013 Page 3 of[4] for secretarial assistance and incidentals which will be paid by the Petitioner separately on production ofvouchers.

9. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

10. A copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master. A certified copy of this order be delivered to the learned CC forthwith.

S. MURALIDHAR, J