Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CM(M) 146/2010
V KASTHURI ...... Petitioner
Through Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Uma Aggarwal and Mr.Pulkit
Aggarwal, Advs.
Through Mr.Shree Prakash Sinha, Adv. with Mr.Nawalendra Kumar, Adv.
PS RAVINDRAN ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Uma Aggarwal and Mr.Pulkit
Aggarwal, Advs.
Through Mr.Shree Prakash Sinha, Adv. with Mr.Nawalendra Kumar, Adv.
V KASTHURI ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Uma Aggarwal and Mr.Pulkit
Aggarwal, Advs.
Through Mr.Shree Prakash Sinha, Adv. with Mr.Nawalendra Kumar, Adv.
2013:DHC:7561 ARJUN RAVINDRAN
Through
Ms.Uma Aggarwal and Mr.Pulkit Aggarwal, Advs.
PGL SECURITIES & LEASING PVT LTD ..... Respondent
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
09.07.2013 After small hearing, with the consent of both the parties, the above mentioned petitions are disposed ofwith the following directions:
ORDER
1. Both the parties agree that the evidence in all the suits as well as in the counter claims be recorded by the Local Commissioner who may be appointed by the learned trial Court. n. They also agree to conclude their respective evidence it the suits as well as in the counter claims before the Local Commissioner within a period of six months and the same be disposed of by the learned trial court within one year from today.
111. They agree not to take unnecessary adjournments in the matter. As agreed, it is directed that all the pleas raised by the parties"are left open. The above mentioned petitions are disposed of accordingly. ~Ih.'R s~~~. JULY 09, 2013 CJI C--"::; 4) t{,r./ ('C. ~ ~~ ~-,.. ( ' 2013:DHC:7561 ";I $~1-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 146/2010 V KASTHURI..... Petitioner Through Ms.Uma Aggarwal, Adv. with Mr.Pulkit Aggarwal, Adv.
VERSUS
PGL SECURITIES & LEASING PVT LTD..... Respondent Through Mr.S.P.Sinha, Adv. + CM(M) 147/2010 PS RAVINDRAN..... Petitioner
VERSUS
+ CM(M) 148/2010 V KASTHURI..... Petitioner versus ll + CM(M) 149/2010 ARJUN RAVINDRAN Through..... Petitioner Ms.Uma Aggarwal, Adv. with %
VERSUS
PGL SECURITIES & LEASING PVT LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH ORDER 11.09.2013 C.M. No.l3759/2013 in CM(M) No.146/2010, C.M. No.13758/2013 in CM(M) No.147/2010, C.M. No.l3755/2013 in CM(M) No.148/2010, and..... Respondent C.M. No.13754/2013 in CM(M) No.149/2010 (all CMs u/s 151 CPC for modification of order dated 9th July, 2013, by petitioner) The abovementioned applications have been filed by the petitioners,--for modification of order dated 9th July, 2013. In the said order, which was passed on consent, both the parties agreed that the evidence in all the suits as well as in the counter-claims be recorded by the Local Commissioner who would be appointed by the learned trial Court. After hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that she would be making the request to the learned trial Court to appoint a Local Commissioner or some retired ADJ for the purpose of compliance of the order dated 9th July, 2013. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection for the same. Let the counsel for the petitioners may make the,.. qA) request accordingly. Both the parties are also agreeable that the fee of the Local Commissioner would be shared by both the parties in equal proportion. As far as the present applications are concerned, I feel that no modification in the order dated 9th July, 2013 is required. The same are disposed of as such. ~OHAN SINGH, J. SEPTEMBER 11, 2013