Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI lA No. 10576/2013 in CS(OS) 2437/2012
DABUR INDIA LTD Plaintiff
Through Mr.Manish Kr.Mishr^, Adv.
DABUR INDIA LTD Plaintiff
Through Mr.Manish Kr.Mishr^, Adv.
VERSUS
MAHINDRA PRASAD & ANR Defendant
Through Mr.Rahul Ranjan Verma, Adv.
Through Mr.Rahul Ranjan Verma, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
09.07.2013 lA 10576/2013 (U/o.23 Rule 3 CPO& CS(OS) 2437/2012
This is an application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC read with Section 151
CPC for recording of the Settlement between the parties and terms of the compromise are incorporated in the application.
In terms of paragraph 9 of the application, learned counsel for the defendant has handed over a demand draft for a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards token damages to the plaintiff. The application is accompanied by an Affidavit of
Mr.B.K.Gupta, Deputy General Manager-Legal and constituted Attorney of the plaintiff company and Mr.Mahavir Prasad/defendant No.2 proprietor of defendant
No.l.
In view of the above, there is no impediment in taking the Settlement on record. The Suit is disposed of in terms of the settlement between the parties, as stated in the application for compromise in paragraph 3 to 10 of IA
No.10576/2013. The Suit is decreed in terms of the settlement. No order as to costs.
JULY 09,2013 n JAYANT NATH, J.
2013:DHC:6711
09.07.2013 lA 10576/2013 (U/o.23 Rule 3 CPO& CS(OS) 2437/2012
This is an application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC read with Section 151
CPC for recording of the Settlement between the parties and terms of the compromise are incorporated in the application.
In terms of paragraph 9 of the application, learned counsel for the defendant has handed over a demand draft for a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards token damages to the plaintiff. The application is accompanied by an Affidavit of
Mr.B.K.Gupta, Deputy General Manager-Legal and constituted Attorney of the plaintiff company and Mr.Mahavir Prasad/defendant No.2 proprietor of defendant
No.l.
In view of the above, there is no impediment in taking the Settlement on record. The Suit is disposed of in terms of the settlement between the parties, as stated in the application for compromise in paragraph 3 to 10 of IA
No.10576/2013. The Suit is decreed in terms of the settlement. No order as to costs.
JULY 09,2013 n JAYANT NATH, J.
2013:DHC:6711
JUDGMENT