Full Text
Translation output
$-16 HIGH COURT OF DELHI CM APPL. 10032-33/2013 in W.P.(C) 433112013, MOHD. YUSUF ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manish Miglani, Advocate.
Through: Mr. Manish Miglani, Advocate.
VERSUS
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS. ..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Sangeeta Sodhi and Mr. Benay Nath Jha, Advocate for R-1.
Through: Ms. Sangeeta Sodhi and Mr. Benay Nath Jha, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICES. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
/o 10.07.2013 After some hearing counsel for the petitioner likes to withdraw the writ petition. It is stated that DRAT would be approached with a request to hear the matter- scheduled for 10.10.2013, for an early date and further submitted that appropriate orders in that regard may be made. In case the petitioner approaches the DRAT for an early hearing the same may be considered reasonably and as far as practicable, the matter be heard at early date.
The writ petition is dismissed. as withdrawn.
~ S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J.
JULY 10, 2013 2013:DHC:7170-DB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
/o 10.07.2013 After some hearing counsel for the petitioner likes to withdraw the writ petition. It is stated that DRAT would be approached with a request to hear the matter- scheduled for 10.10.2013, for an early date and further submitted that appropriate orders in that regard may be made. In case the petitioner approaches the DRAT for an early hearing the same may be considered reasonably and as far as practicable, the matter be heard at early date.
The writ petition is dismissed. as withdrawn.
~ S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J.
JULY 10, 2013 2013:DHC:7170-DB
JUDGMENT