Ram Jano v. State NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 18 Jul 2013 · 2013:DHC:6927
Sunil Gaur
Bail Appln. 536/2013
2013:DHC:6927
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted absolute interim bail to the petitioners, relatives of the main accused, subject to cooperation with investigation and furnishing bail bonds and sureties.

Full Text
Translation output
. f

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 536/2013
RAMJANO ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sameer Chandra , Advocate
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State with SI Mukesh
BAIL APPLN. 537/2013
NAJISH PARVEEN ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
NARGIS
BAIL APPLN. 538/2013 ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
Bail Application No.536j2013 Bail Application No.537j2013
Bail Application No.538j2013 Page 1 2013:DHC:6927
I
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
18.07.2013 Petitioners are the mother and two daughters of main accused
Yunish Khan, who is in custody. While entertaining the above-captioned three applications, interim protection was granted to petitioners subject to their joining investigation.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State confirms that petitioners have joined the investigation of this case. The case of petitioners appear to be at par with co-accused Kheru Nisha, who has been granted pre-arrest interim bail by this Court and it is confirmed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court (in Bail Application No. 535/2013).
In the light of above, interim order of 3rd April, 2013 in the above- captioned three applications is made absolute. Without commenting on the merits of the case, it is directed that in the event of arrest, petitioners-
Ram Jano, wife of late Yusuf Khan, Najish Parveen & Nargis, two daughters of Yusnis Khan, be admitted to bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of ~30,000/- with one local surety each, to the satisfaction ofthe Investigating Officer/ Arresting Officer.
Needless to say, if petitioners do not join and cooperate with the
Bail Application No.536/2013 Bail Application No.537/2013
Page2 , •
• investigation, then respondent- State would be at liberty to get this order revoked.
The above captioned three applications are disposed of in aforesaid terms.
Dasti.
JULY 18,2013 r Bail Application No.536j2013 Bail Application No.537j2013
Page 3
JUDGMENT