Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 575/2013
KULDEEP SHARMA Petitioner
Through: Mr. RahulTyagi, Advocate
BAIL APPLN. 575/2013
KULDEEP SHARMA Petitioner
Through: Mr. RahulTyagi, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State with Inspector K.K. Tiwari
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State with Inspector K.K. Tiwari
BAIL APPLN. 792/2013
SANDEEP KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Through: Mr. RahulTyagi, Advocate
SANDEEP KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Through: Mr. RahulTyagi, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State with Inspector K.K. Tiwari
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State with Inspector K.K. Tiwari
CORAM;
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
17.07.2013 While entertaining the pre- arrest bail application of petitioner-
Kuldeep Sharma, the factual background of this case has been noted in order of8'^ April, 2013.
BailApplication No.575/2013 Page1 Bail Application No. 792/2013
2013:DHC:7022 j Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that petitioners in th^ afore-captioned two petitions havejoined the investigation in terms of the last order.
In view of the fact that complamant has not supported the pi^osecution case qua co-accused of petitioner and the initial version of thp PGR official- SI Kamal Singh that information regarding revolver being used in this incidentwas foundto be incorrect, interimorders of 8""
April, 2013 (in Bail AppHcation No. 575/2013) and lO'^ May, 2013 (in
Bail Application No. 792/2013) are made absolute.
Withoutcommenting on the merits of this case, it is directed that in the event ofarrest, petitioners- Kuldeep Sharma, son oflate Shri Jagdish
Pi[asad Sharma and Sandeep Kumar, son of Shri Karan Pal Singh be admitted to bail subject to their furnishing bail bond in the sum of
^0,000/- with one local surety each inthe like amount, tothe satisfaction of the Arrestmg Officer/ Investigating Officer. Needless to say that if ki petitioners do notjoin and cooperate inthe investigation ofthis case, then respondent -State wouldbe at liberty to get this orderrevoked.
17.07.2013 While entertaining the pre- arrest bail application of petitioner-
Kuldeep Sharma, the factual background of this case has been noted in order of8'^ April, 2013.
BailApplication No.575/2013 Page1 Bail Application No. 792/2013
2013:DHC:7022 j Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that petitioners in th^ afore-captioned two petitions havejoined the investigation in terms of the last order.
In view of the fact that complamant has not supported the pi^osecution case qua co-accused of petitioner and the initial version of thp PGR official- SI Kamal Singh that information regarding revolver being used in this incidentwas foundto be incorrect, interimorders of 8""
April, 2013 (in Bail AppHcation No. 575/2013) and lO'^ May, 2013 (in
Bail Application No. 792/2013) are made absolute.
Withoutcommenting on the merits of this case, it is directed that in the event ofarrest, petitioners- Kuldeep Sharma, son oflate Shri Jagdish
Pi[asad Sharma and Sandeep Kumar, son of Shri Karan Pal Singh be admitted to bail subject to their furnishing bail bond in the sum of
^0,000/- with one local surety each inthe like amount, tothe satisfaction of the Arrestmg Officer/ Investigating Officer. Needless to say that if ki petitioners do notjoin and cooperate inthe investigation ofthis case, then respondent -State wouldbe at liberty to get this orderrevoked.
ORDER
1 With aforesaid observations, above captioned two petitions are disposed of Dasti. •^UMLGAtR)
JUDGE JULY 17, 2013 r Application No.575/2013 BailApplication No.792/2013 Page 2