Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 2469/2025, CM APPLs. 11652/2025, 11653/2025 &
11654/2025 NATIONAL TECHNICAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION GOVT OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC
Through: Mr. Sachin Chauhan and Ms. Ridhi Dua, Advs.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL)
27.02.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT
1. The order challenged in this writ petition reads thus: “We would have passed common order(s) in all the cases. However, request was made on behalf of official respondents to pass separate order(s) in each OA for taking appropriate action and administrative measures. We accept the said plea.
2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue raised in this OA stands concluded by the decision of this Tribunal in OA No. 3726/2023 titled as Vikas Kumar Sain V/s Staff Selection Commission and Ors. decided on 22.04.2024.
3. For parity of reasons, we allow the present OA in terms of the directions given in the aforesaid OA. However, for the sake of the convenience, the directions given by the Tribunal in Vikas Kumar Sain (Supra) case are reproduced below:-
4. In view of the above, this OA is also disposed of in the light of aforesaid directions. No order as to costs.”
2. The contention of Ms. Dwivedi, who appears for the petitioners, is that the main contesting party before the Tribunal was the Staff Selection Commission and that if the impugned order is to apply to NTRO, who is the petitioner before us, it would create several difficulties.
3. In view of the nature of the order passed, we find it difficult for us to interfere with the order under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Tribunal has plainly acted as per the submissions made by the parties, including the respondents before it.
4. We, therefore, dispose of the writ petition, reserving liberty with the petitioners to move an appropriate application before the Tribunal, whether by way of review or any other application as advised, in accordance with law. Any such application, if and when moved, would be decided by the Tribunal on its own merits.
5. The writ petition is disposed of.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.