Full Text
Translation output
'-
~-
:11-15-31 ;;C:/l
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELID AT NEW DELID
+ W.P.(C) 5944/2010 and CM No. 7007/2013
RAMBIR SINGH
Through
~-
:11-15-31 ;;C:/l
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELID AT NEW DELID
+ W.P.(C) 5944/2010 and CM No. 7007/2013
RAMBIR SINGH
Through
VERSUS
..... Petitioner
Mr. Digvijay Rai, Advocate
GOVT OF NCT OF DELID & ORS ..... Respondents
Through Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Pathak, Adv. for GNCTD
+ W.P.(C) 188/2011 and CM No. 3876/2012
SIDV DUTT ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Digvijay Rai, Advocate
GOVT OF NCT OF DELID & ORS ..... Respondents
Through Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Pathak, Adv. for GNCTD
+ W.P.(C) 188/2011 and CM No. 3876/2012
SIDV DUTT ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Advocate
VERSUS
GOVT OF NCT OF DLEHI & ANR ..... Respondents
+ W.P.(C) 3126/2011 and CM No. 3774/2012
+
RANllT SINGH ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate
+ W.P.(C) 3126/2011 and CM No. 3774/2012
+
RANllT SINGH ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate
VERSUS
GOVT OF NCT OF DELID & ANR ..... Respondents
W.P.(C) 3647/2011 and CM No. 3715/2012
PREMSINGH
Through
W.P.(C) 3647/2011 and CM No. 3715/2012
PREMSINGH
Through
VERSUS
Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate
GNCT OF DELID AND ANR ..... Respondents
2013:DHC:7247
"-'
+ bf
W.P.(C) 4153/2011 and CM No. 3770/2012
ANAND PAL ..... Petitioner (
Through
GNCT OF DELID AND ANR ..... Respondents
2013:DHC:7247
"-'
+ bf
W.P.(C) 4153/2011 and CM No. 3770/2012
ANAND PAL ..... Petitioner (
Through
VERSUS
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELID ANR. ..... Respondents
+ W.P.(C) 4744/2011 and CM No. 4345/2012
OM PRAKASH ..... Petitioner
+ W.P.(C) 4744/2011 and CM No. 4345/2012
OM PRAKASH ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELID AND ANR. ..... Respondents
+ W.P.(C) 7196/2011 and CM Nos. 4349-4350/2012
SUBHASH CHAND ..... Petitioner
+ W.P.(C) 7196/2011 and CM Nos. 4349-4350/2012
SUBHASH CHAND ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELID AND ANR ..... Respondents
+ W.P.(C) 3583/2011 and CM No. 3764/2012
OM PAL ..... Petitioner
+ W.P.(C) 3583/2011 and CM No. 3764/2012
OM PAL ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
GNCT OF DELID AND ANR ..... Respondents
'--
+ W.P.(C) 4136/2011 and CM No. 3772/2012
SULTAN SINGH ..... Petitioner
GJ--
/
'--
+ W.P.(C) 4136/2011 and CM No. 3772/2012
SULTAN SINGH ..... Petitioner
GJ--
/
VERSUS
GOVERNMENT Of NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents
+ W.P.(C) 5352/2011 and CM No. 4035/2012
OM PAL ..... Petitioner
+ W.P.(C) 5352/2011 and CM No. 4035/2012
OM PAL ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents
+ W.P.(C) 6022/2011 and CM No. 3717/2012
+
PREMRAJ ..... Petitioner
+ W.P.(C) 6022/2011 and CM No. 3717/2012
+
PREMRAJ ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
W.P.(C) 6023/2011 and CM No. 3710/2012
GIRl RAJ
Through
GIRl RAJ
Through
VERSUS
W.P.(C) 5944/2010 and connected matters page 3 of6
·-
+ W.P.(C) 6024/2011 and CM No. 3766/2012 ~~
.J
BEG RAJ ..... Petitioner
·-
+ W.P.(C) 6024/2011 and CM No. 3766/2012 ~~
.J
BEG RAJ ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
+ W.P.(C) 6074/2011 and CM No. 19655/2012
ISHWAR SINGH ..... Petitioner
ISHWAR SINGH ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
· GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents
+ W.P.(C) 6128/2011 and CM No.19654/2012
+ llTOKAUR ..... Petitioner
+ W.P.(C) 6128/2011 and CM No.19654/2012
+ llTOKAUR ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
W.P.(C) 6147/2011 and CM No. 20084/2012
KASHMIR SINGH
Through
KASHMIR SINGH
Through
VERSUS
W.P.(C) 5944/2010 and connected matters page 4of6
',_
,_
+ W.P.(C) 6175/2011 and CM No. 3768/2012
BHAGWANT SINGH ..... Petitioner ~ ~!
',_
,_
+ W.P.(C) 6175/2011 and CM No. 3768/2012
BHAGWANT SINGH ..... Petitioner ~ ~!
VERSUS
GOVT. NCT & ANR ..... Respondents
,.~
,.~
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN
/o 31.07.2013
The petitioners in these writ petitions are aggrieved from the
"abnormal delay in consideration of their applications for allotment of alternative plots under the scheme framed by the Government of India vide its letter dated 2nd May, 1961 for allotment of alternative plots to those whose agricultural land was acquired for planned development ofDelhi.
Vide order dated 19th December, 2011 passed in W.P.(C) NO. 6074/2011 and connected matters, this Court directed the respondents to expedite the whole process and dispose of at least 100 applications in a fortnight which comes to 200 applications in a month.
Vide order dated 12th April, 2013 passed by this Court, it was directed that the Committee constituted to make recommendations for allotment of alternative plots would meet at least for half a day on every alternate working day and the cause list for the said Committee would have at least 25 matters. CM No. 7007/2013 has been filed in W.P. (C) No. 5944/2010 by the Government ofIndia seeking modification ofthe aforesaid order.
''-
/-.::::._.., ,_ li
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considered a!~~ facts and circumstances including, the huge backlog of the applicationY seeking allotment of alternative plots, it is directed that the Committee constituted to consider the applications for allotment of alternative plots will consider at least 250 applications in a month though the effort of the
Committee shall b~ to consider as many applications as may be possible so as to liquidate the pendency at the earliest possible.
It is also directed that the number of Officers/officials engaged exclusively in scrutinizing applications for allotment of alternative plots shall not be reduced by the Government, so long as the pendency does not come to a comfortable level or say 1000 applications.
It is made clear that this order will not come in the way for
Government transferring these Officers/officials so long as they are replaced by other Officers/officials.
The writ petitions stand disposed ofin terms of aforesaid directions.
It is also directed that a compliance report giving the number of applications considered by the said Committee in a month shall be filed by the Goveillffi;{mt by way of an affidavit of the concerned Officer by the 15th of each succeeding month. It is also made clear that any disobedience of these directions will render the Officer(s) concerned liable to action for disobeying the order ofthe Court.
Copy ofthis order be given dasti under signatures ofCourt Master.
JULY 31, 2013
~
The petitioners in these writ petitions are aggrieved from the
"abnormal delay in consideration of their applications for allotment of alternative plots under the scheme framed by the Government of India vide its letter dated 2nd May, 1961 for allotment of alternative plots to those whose agricultural land was acquired for planned development ofDelhi.
Vide order dated 19th December, 2011 passed in W.P.(C) NO. 6074/2011 and connected matters, this Court directed the respondents to expedite the whole process and dispose of at least 100 applications in a fortnight which comes to 200 applications in a month.
Vide order dated 12th April, 2013 passed by this Court, it was directed that the Committee constituted to make recommendations for allotment of alternative plots would meet at least for half a day on every alternate working day and the cause list for the said Committee would have at least 25 matters. CM No. 7007/2013 has been filed in W.P. (C) No. 5944/2010 by the Government ofIndia seeking modification ofthe aforesaid order.
''-
/-.::::._.., ,_ li
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considered a!~~ facts and circumstances including, the huge backlog of the applicationY seeking allotment of alternative plots, it is directed that the Committee constituted to consider the applications for allotment of alternative plots will consider at least 250 applications in a month though the effort of the
Committee shall b~ to consider as many applications as may be possible so as to liquidate the pendency at the earliest possible.
It is also directed that the number of Officers/officials engaged exclusively in scrutinizing applications for allotment of alternative plots shall not be reduced by the Government, so long as the pendency does not come to a comfortable level or say 1000 applications.
It is made clear that this order will not come in the way for
Government transferring these Officers/officials so long as they are replaced by other Officers/officials.
The writ petitions stand disposed ofin terms of aforesaid directions.
It is also directed that a compliance report giving the number of applications considered by the said Committee in a month shall be filed by the Goveillffi;{mt by way of an affidavit of the concerned Officer by the 15th of each succeeding month. It is also made clear that any disobedience of these directions will render the Officer(s) concerned liable to action for disobeying the order ofthe Court.
Copy ofthis order be given dasti under signatures ofCourt Master.
JULY 31, 2013
~
JUDGMENT