PARMANAND LAL v. R. CHANDERSHEKHAR

Delhi High Court · 07 Aug 2013 · 2013:DHC:8615
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
Cont.CAS(C) 377/2013
2013:DHC:8615
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition as infructuous due to the pendency of a review petition and rehearing of the related writ petition.

Full Text
Translation output
$-43 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C) 377/2013
PARMANAND LAL Petitioner
Through None.
VERSUS
R. CHANDERSHEKHAR Respondent
Through Mr. R. V. Sinha with Mr. A. S. Singh, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
07.08.2013 Cont. CasfC) No.377/2013 & CM No.8813/2013
There is no appearance on behalfof the petitioner.
Counsel for the respondent submits that as a matter of fact, the application, being
R.P.No.333/2013, seeking review of the decision of this Court in Writ Petition (C)
No.4639/2012, titled as Permanand Lai v. The Secretary, Department of
Telecommunications, decided on ll"' January, 2013, has been considered by this
Court on 19"^ July, 2013 and, as a consequence, itwas ordered that, "2. Matter need reconsideration". He further submits that pursuant to the aforesaid, the writ petition was heard afresh on 25"^ July, 2013 and the
ORDER
thereon has been reserved.
In that view of the matter, the instant petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed ofas such, along with CM No.8813/2013.
A - SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J AUGUST 07, 2013 dr
2013:DHC:8615