Full Text
Translation output
$36 & 37 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RC.REV. 250/2012 & C.M. No.10264/2012 (for stay)
KEWAL HANDA Petitioner
Through Mr.Satish Sharma, Adv.
RC.REV. 250/2012 & C.M. No.10264/2012 (for stay)
KEWAL HANDA Petitioner
Through Mr.Satish Sharma, Adv.
VERSUS
MOHD SWALIN & ORS Respondents
Through Mr.Ashutosh Gupta, Adv.
Through Mr.Ashutosh Gupta, Adv.
RC.REV. 251/2012 & C.M. No.10279/2012 (for stay)
KEWAL HANDA Petitioner
Through Mr.Satish Sharma, Adv.
KEWAL HANDA Petitioner
Through Mr.Satish Sharma, Adv.
VERSUS
MOHD SWALIN & ORS Respondents
Through Mr.Ashutosh Gupta, Adv.
Through Mr.Ashutosh Gupta, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
23.08.2013 The petitioner assails the order dated 31st March, 2012 whereby the application filed by respondent No.1/tenant (defendant in the suit before the trial Court) under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 for leave to defend was allowed.
The petitioner along with respondents No.2 to 4 have filed two eviction petitions against the respondent No.1 under Section 14(1 )(e) of the
2013:DHC:8448 -I DRC Act, bearing Nos.E-86/201 1 & E-87/201 1. Learned counsel for the parties have informed that both the cases are at the stage of cross- examination of PW- 1. After hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner is agreeable that in case, the proceedings before the trial court are expedited, he would not press the present petitions. Ordered accordingly. The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the proceedings and conclude the trial in the above said eviction petitions, if possible, within a period of six months.
The petitions are accordingly disposed of. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
I WAAWHV^&GH' ! AUGUST 23, 2013 2013:DHC:8448
23.08.2013 The petitioner assails the order dated 31st March, 2012 whereby the application filed by respondent No.1/tenant (defendant in the suit before the trial Court) under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 for leave to defend was allowed.
The petitioner along with respondents No.2 to 4 have filed two eviction petitions against the respondent No.1 under Section 14(1 )(e) of the
2013:DHC:8448 -I DRC Act, bearing Nos.E-86/201 1 & E-87/201 1. Learned counsel for the parties have informed that both the cases are at the stage of cross- examination of PW- 1. After hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner is agreeable that in case, the proceedings before the trial court are expedited, he would not press the present petitions. Ordered accordingly. The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the proceedings and conclude the trial in the above said eviction petitions, if possible, within a period of six months.
The petitions are accordingly disposed of. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
I WAAWHV^&GH' ! AUGUST 23, 2013 2013:DHC:8448
JUDGMENT