Colgate Palmolive Company & Anr v. Hindustan Unilever Ltd

Delhi High Court · 23 Aug 2013 · 2013:DHC:6990-DB
S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmiwaziri
FAO(OS) 381/2013
2013:DHC:6990-DB
civil appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted liberty to the appellants to file a fresh injunction application with new material and dismissed the present appeal as withdrawn.

Full Text
Translation output
• r
$-15 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO(OS) 381/2013, CM APPL. 12939-41/2013, CAV 730/2013
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY & ANR Appellants , j
Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Mr. V. Seshagiri, Ms. Nancy Roy and
Mr. Alok Tiwari, Advocates.
VERSUS
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD Respondent
Through: Mr. Ashok Desai, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sameer Parekh, Ms. Rukhmini, Mr. Shashank Kumar and
Mr. Kshatrshal Raj, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
23.08.2013 During the course of submissions, learned counsel for the appellants stated that new material in the form of newspaper articles, letters from dentists and information from consumers has been made available to establish disparagement in the minds of the consumers. He seeks liberty to approach the learned Single Judge with a fresh application for injunction and place on record such new material. j
Liberty granted. All rights and contentions ofthe parties are reserved.
It is open to the appellant to impugn the correctness of the order which may be made in the fresh application and also if necessary, impugn the order which is the subject matter ofthe present appeal.
2013:DHC:6990-DB
2—
N" " J In view ofthe above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVUSTDRA BHAT, J AUGUST 23,2013 mv AJMIWAZIRI, J
2013:DHC:6990-DB
JUDGMENT