Surbhi v. State & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 06 Sep 2013 · 2013:DHC:8258
Sunil Gaur; Junil Gaur
TR.P.(CRL.) 20/2013
2013:DHC:8258
criminal other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the criminal petition as infructuous on the submission of the petitioner’s counsel.

Full Text
Translation output
$-15 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TR.P.(CRL.) 20/2013 & Crl.M.A.Nos. 5777-78/2013
SURBHI Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajiv Khosla & Mr. Harshit Jain, Advocates with Petitioner-in-person
VERSUS
STATE & ANR. Respondents
Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
06.09.2013 Mr. Rajiv Khosla, Advocate for petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this petition and applications are disposed of as such.
JUNIL GAUR, J SEPTEMBER 06, 2013 vn 2013:DHC:8258
JUDGMENT