Full Text
Translation output
$-7
* IN THE fflGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRX.) 1834/2012
RAJA JOUHAL Petitioner
Through; Mr. VikasChadha andMr. Sourabh
Luthra, Advs.
* IN THE fflGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRX.) 1834/2012
RAJA JOUHAL Petitioner
Through; Mr. VikasChadha andMr. Sourabh
Luthra, Advs.
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT FO DELHI & ORS. Respondents
Through; Mr. Rajat Agnihotri,Adv. for Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with SI Madan, PS Sagarpur.
Mr. Sunil Verma, Adv. for R-3.
Through; Mr. Rajat Agnihotri,Adv. for Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with SI Madan, PS Sagarpur.
Mr. Sunil Verma, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA
% 06.09.2013
Rejoinder has not been filed by the petitioner. It is submitted that along with the reply filed by the respondent, some additional documents have been filed.
As such he seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition after submissionofcharge sheet.
As such this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. iuviih
SUNITA GUPTA, J
SEPTEMBER 06,2013 cl
2013:DHC:7503
% 06.09.2013
Rejoinder has not been filed by the petitioner. It is submitted that along with the reply filed by the respondent, some additional documents have been filed.
As such he seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition after submissionofcharge sheet.
As such this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. iuviih
SUNITA GUPTA, J
SEPTEMBER 06,2013 cl
2013:DHC:7503
JUDGMENT