Full Text
Translation output
—
$-33 8c 34 HIGH COURT OF DELHI (i) CRL.M.C. 3512/2013
SANJAY GAIROLA Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sandeep MaHk, Advocate
$-33 8c 34 HIGH COURT OF DELHI (i) CRL.M.C. 3512/2013
SANJAY GAIROLA Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sandeep MaHk, Advocate
VERSUS
PIYUSH SINGHANIA Respondent
Through: Nemo (ii) TR.P. (CRL.) 9/2013 & & CrI.M.A. No.4336/2013/2013
SANJAY GAIROLA .... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sandeep Malik, Advocate
Through: Nemo (ii) TR.P. (CRL.) 9/2013 & & CrI.M.A. No.4336/2013/2013
SANJAY GAIROLA .... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sandeep Malik, Advocate
VERSUS
PIYUSH SINGHANIA Respondent
Through: Nemo
Through: Nemo
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
10.09.2013 Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, submits that both these petitions have become infhictuous.
Accordingly, both the petitions andthe applications are disposed of as infructuous.
(SUNIL GAUR)
Judge SEPTEMBER 10,2013 s Page 2013:DHC:8249
10.09.2013 Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, submits that both these petitions have become infhictuous.
Accordingly, both the petitions andthe applications are disposed of as infructuous.
(SUNIL GAUR)
Judge SEPTEMBER 10,2013 s Page 2013:DHC:8249
JUDGMENT