Full Text
RAMBIR MANN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Atul Bandhu with Mr. Varun Kumar &
Mr. Rajesh Passey, Advs.
Through: Ms. Ritika Nagpal with Ml : til,T,iT'?L,f:f."1"1 i-, Mr. Amitesh Kumar. Adv. for R-4. r w.P.(c) 3229t20r3
MAHESH VOHRA ..... Petitioner
R[ti. Nagpar with ""' Respondents Mr. Amit Bansal, Advs. for R-1.
, Mr. Anurag Mathur, Adv. for R-2.
Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-4.
.:- + w.P.(c) 3292t2013 VINOD KUMAR ..... Petitioner
W.P.(C) 302812013 & Conn. Matters Page I of 4
2013:DHC:7130 i Mr. Anurag Mathur, Adv. for R-2. w.P.(c) 334st20r3
RAM NIWAS ..... Petitioner VETSUS UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents w.P.(c) 3r64t20r3
SURENDER KUMAR ... Petitioner
AMIT JAMWAL ..... Petitioner
I w.P.(c) 3166/2013 GOPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner
VETSUS
, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents w.P.(c) 3198/2013
RAJIV KUMARNARVARIYA ..... Petitioner
13.09.2013
ORDER
1. Counsel appearing for UGC has placed on record a leffer dated 12.6.2013 as per which cancellation of the services of the petitioners have been recalled and they have been treated as employed from their actual date of appointments as regular staff however, in the category of Multi Tasking W.P.(C) 3028/2013 & Conn. Matters J- L Staff. Counsel also states that serial no.7 is wrongly mentioned as 'suresh Kumar' whereas it should be 'surender Kumar'.
2. In view of the above, the reliefs which are prayed in these petitions are satisfied, and therefore, counsels for the petitioners do not press these writ petitions.
3. It is, however, clarified that if the petitioners are in any manner aggrieved by putting them as Multi Tasking Staff, and if they lose any legal right for that reason, the petitioners can showing how their legal rights are affected, file independent petitions with respect to such legal rights.
4. Writ petitions are accordingly dismissed as infructuous, subject however to the aforesaid observations. \TM VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J SEPTEMBER I[3],2OT[3] ak W.P.(C) 302812013 & Conn. Matters Page 4 of[4] 4*