Full Text
Translation output
$-42, 43, 45 & 46 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 2605/2013
AMRIK SINGH BAGRI
Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anil Aggarwal, Mr. Puneet Aggarwal &
Ms. Alpana Pachuri, Advs.
W.P.(C) 2605/2013
AMRIK SINGH BAGRI
Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anil Aggarwal, Mr. Puneet Aggarwal &
Ms. Alpana Pachuri, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with
Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, CGSC, Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Mr. Kartikey Mahajan
& Ms. Shruti Aggarwal, Advs.
Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with
Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, CGSC, Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Mr. Kartikey Mahajan
& Ms. Shruti Aggarwal, Advs.
W.P.(C) 2614/2013
SARWAN SINGH BAGRI
Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anil Aggarwal, Mr. Puneet Aggarwal &
SARWAN SINGH BAGRI
Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anil Aggarwal, Mr. Puneet Aggarwal &
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with
Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with
W.P.(C) 4124/2013
RAMINDER KAUR MALIK ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anil Aggarwal, Mr. Puneet Aggarwal &
2013:DHC:7226 '
RAMINDER KAUR MALIK ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anil Aggarwal, Mr. Puneet Aggarwal &
2013:DHC:7226 '
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with
Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with
W.P.(C) 4125/2013
GURDIP SINGH MALIK ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anil Aggarwal, Mr. Puneet Aggarwal &
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Through:
GURDIP SINGH MALIK ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anil Aggarwal, Mr. Puneet Aggarwal &
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Through:
CORAM:
VERSUS
..... Respondents Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN Arguments heard.
24.09.2013 The writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Union of
India to treat the same as representations of the petitioners for excluding/removing their name from the blacklist, i.e., the list containing the names of the persons to whom Visa is denied for entering this country, and pass an appropriate order on the said representation, within twelve (12) weeks from today. The order so passed shall be communicated toype petitioners within two (2) weeks thereafter. If the petitioners are aggri~ed from the decision on their representation, they can avail of such remedies, if any, as are open to them in law in this regard.
SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 b'nesh / V.K. JAIN, J.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN Arguments heard.
24.09.2013 The writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Union of
India to treat the same as representations of the petitioners for excluding/removing their name from the blacklist, i.e., the list containing the names of the persons to whom Visa is denied for entering this country, and pass an appropriate order on the said representation, within twelve (12) weeks from today. The order so passed shall be communicated toype petitioners within two (2) weeks thereafter. If the petitioners are aggri~ed from the decision on their representation, they can avail of such remedies, if any, as are open to them in law in this regard.
SEPTEMBER 24, 2013 b'nesh / V.K. JAIN, J.
JUDGMENT