Full Text
Translation output
$-23 8c 30 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 4539/2013
JAGAT SINGH & ORS.
Through:
Petitioner Mr. K.S. Verma & Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocates
STATE & ORS.
CRL.M.C. 4539/2013
JAGAT SINGH & ORS.
Through:
Petitioner Mr. K.S. Verma & Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocates
STATE & ORS.
VERSUS
Respondents
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 1-State with SI
Satish Lohia
Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 1-State with SI
Satish Lohia
CRL.M.C. 4547/2013
RAJ PAL & ORS.
Through:
Petitioners Mr. K.S. Verma & Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocates
RAJ PAL & ORS.
Through:
Petitioners Mr. K.S. Verma & Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE & ORS.
Through:
Respondents Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI
Satish Lohia
Through:
Respondents Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI
Satish Lohia
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
29.10.2013 In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of FIR No.
CrI. M.C. No.4539/2013 Page 1 2013:DHC:7898 t
257/2013, under Sections 452/379/356/506/34 of the IPC, (in Crl. M.C.
No. 4539/2013) and FIR No. 258/2013, under Sections 452/506/34 ofthe
IPC (in Crl. M.C.No. 4547/2013), registered at police station Fatehpur
Beri, New Delhi is sought.
After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw these petitions with liberty to file fresh ones whileexplaining the incident in question.
The above captioned two petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
OCTOBER 29, 2013 r ^IL GAUR)
JUDGE
Crl. M.C. No.4539/2013 2 2013:DHC:7898
29.10.2013 In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of FIR No.
CrI. M.C. No.4539/2013 Page 1 2013:DHC:7898 t
257/2013, under Sections 452/379/356/506/34 of the IPC, (in Crl. M.C.
No. 4539/2013) and FIR No. 258/2013, under Sections 452/506/34 ofthe
IPC (in Crl. M.C.No. 4547/2013), registered at police station Fatehpur
Beri, New Delhi is sought.
After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw these petitions with liberty to file fresh ones whileexplaining the incident in question.
The above captioned two petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
OCTOBER 29, 2013 r ^IL GAUR)
JUDGE
Crl. M.C. No.4539/2013 2 2013:DHC:7898
JUDGMENT