(3) CPC) v. 1. None appears for the Decree Holder. According to the Judgment Debtor, the decree stands satisfied

Delhi High Court · 01 Nov 2013 · 2013:DHC:7997

S. Muralidhar

EX.P. No. 317 of 2010 & Ex. APPL No. 579 of 2012

2013:DHC:7997

civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed an execution petition for non-prosecution due to the Decree Holder's absence and accepted the Judgment Debtor's claim of decree satisfaction.

Full Text

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
EX.P. No. 317 of2010 &Ex. APPL No. 579 of2012 (u/O XXIR5

JUDGMENT

(3) CPC)

VERSUS

SANTOSH JASRASARIA Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. DineshGargwith Ms. Rachna Agrawal, Advocates for LR (a) of JUDGMENT DEBTOR CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER % 01.11.2013

1. None appears for the Decree Holder. According to the Judgment Debtor, the decree stands satisfied.

2. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. The pending application also stands dismissed.

S.MURALIDHAR, J NOVEMBER 01,2013 Rk

(3) CPC) v. 1. None appears for the Decree Holder. According to the Judgment Debtor, the decree stands satisfied

AI Summary

Full Text

JUDGMENT

Contact Us for a Free Consultation