Full Text
Translation output
/ a $-1/2 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 1419/2013
AMANDEEP SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. K.K. Manan and Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Adys.
BAIL APPLN. 1419/2013
AMANDEEP SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. K.K. Manan and Mr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Adys.
VERSUS
STATE NCTOFDELHI Respondent
Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State with ASIRajender Singh, P.S.MotiNagar.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. for complainant.
Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State with ASIRajender Singh, P.S.MotiNagar.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv. for complainant.
AND
BAIL APPLN. 1414/2013
KIRANJIT KAUR Petitioner
Through: Mr. K.K. Manan andMr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Advs.
KIRANJIT KAUR Petitioner
Through: Mr. K.K. Manan andMr. Nipun Bhardwaj, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent
Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State with ASIRajenderSingh, P.S. MotiNagar.
Mr. AjaySharma, Adv. for complainant.
Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State with ASIRajenderSingh, P.S. MotiNagar.
Mr. AjaySharma, Adv. for complainant.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
07.11.2013 Learned counsel for the parties state that the matter could not be settled before the mediator.
2013:DHC:6869 s Learned counsel appearing for the complainant/wife submits that all the jewellery/dowry articles ofthe complainant/wife have not been returned by the petitioners. In the FIR, the complainant has also levelled allegations ofcrueltyagainstthe petitioners.
On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that jewellery/dowry articles are already with the complainant/wife. It is further submitted that the allegations of cruelty levelled in the FIR are false. It is further submitted that the allegations levelled are subject matter ofevidence. However, without prejudice to the rights and contentions ofthe petitioners, the petitioner/husband is willing to give ^6 lakhs to the complainant/wife, as such request ofpetitioners for the grant ofanticipatory bail be allowed.
Learned counsel appearing for the complainant has not opposed the request.
Subject to payment of aforesaid amount to the complainant within four weeks, it is ordered that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond in the sum of ^15,000/- each with one surety of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/I.O.
The bail applications stand disposed of.
Dasti.
VEENAB
NOVEMBER 07,2013 kks/srb 2013:DHC:6869
07.11.2013 Learned counsel for the parties state that the matter could not be settled before the mediator.
2013:DHC:6869 s Learned counsel appearing for the complainant/wife submits that all the jewellery/dowry articles ofthe complainant/wife have not been returned by the petitioners. In the FIR, the complainant has also levelled allegations ofcrueltyagainstthe petitioners.
On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that jewellery/dowry articles are already with the complainant/wife. It is further submitted that the allegations of cruelty levelled in the FIR are false. It is further submitted that the allegations levelled are subject matter ofevidence. However, without prejudice to the rights and contentions ofthe petitioners, the petitioner/husband is willing to give ^6 lakhs to the complainant/wife, as such request ofpetitioners for the grant ofanticipatory bail be allowed.
Learned counsel appearing for the complainant has not opposed the request.
Subject to payment of aforesaid amount to the complainant within four weeks, it is ordered that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond in the sum of ^15,000/- each with one surety of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/I.O.
The bail applications stand disposed of.
Dasti.
VEENAB
NOVEMBER 07,2013 kks/srb 2013:DHC:6869
JUDGMENT