Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO(OS) 479/2013
REKHA PANDEY Appellant
Through: Mr Rinku Choudhary, Advocate.
FAO(OS) 479/2013
REKHA PANDEY Appellant
Through: Mr Rinku Choudhary, Advocate.
VERSUS
ID PANDEY & ANR Respondents
Through: Ms EktaK. Sikri and Mr P. Dey, Advocates.
Through: Ms EktaK. Sikri and Mr P. Dey, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
08.11.2013 CM No.16906/2013 The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the delay being condoned. Consequently, this application is allowed. The delay stands condoned.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
08.11.2013 CM No.16906/2013 The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the delay being condoned. Consequently, this application is allowed. The delay stands condoned.
FAO(OS) 479/2013 & CM No.16907/2013 ^
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the respondent agrees thatthe statement made by the appellant, Ms Rekha Pandey under Order 10 Rule 2 CPC can be recorded as a statement not made under oath and only as a statement under Order 10 Rule
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the respondent agrees thatthe statement made by the appellant, Ms Rekha Pandey under Order 10 Rule 2 CPC can be recorded as a statement not made under oath and only as a statement under Order 10 Rule
ORDER
2 CPC. We record this statement on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondents and direct accordingly. We also direct the Local Commissioner to expedite the recording of evidence. 2013:DHC:7322-DB With these observations and directions, the appeal and the application stand disposed of.
NOVEMBER 08, 2013 MK BAl)AR DURREZ AHMED, J VIBHUBAKHRU, J