M.L. Pasricha v. Pt. Mohan Lal & Sons Thr. Lrs

Delhi High Court · 18 Nov 2013 · 2013:DHC:7392
Manmohan Singh
CM(M)996/2012, C.M.Nos.15510/2012 & 15512/2012
2013:DHC:7392
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

Petitions challenging interim orders were dismissed as infructuous and in default after final decree for possession was passed in favour of respondents.

Full Text
Translation output
$--8 &9 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CM(M)996/2012,C.M.Nos.15510/2012& 15512/2012
M.L.PASRICHA Petitioner
Through None
VERSUS
PT. MOHAN LAL&SONS THR.LRS Respondents
Through Mr.Ajay Garg,Adv.with Ms.Pooja Venna,Adv.along with R-4 in person.
CM(M)998/2012,C.M.Nos.15543/2012& 15545/2012
VEENA PASRICHA Petitioner
Through None
VERSUS
PT. MOHAN LAL&SONS THR.LRS Respondents
Through Mr.Ajay Garg,Adv.with Ms.Pooja Venna,Adv.along with R-4 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
18.11.2013 Learned counsel for the respondents states that the above said two petitions were filed by the petitioners against the impugned orders which were passed in the inteiim applications whereby the defence of the petitioners was struck off. He fuither states that now,the final orders have
2013:DHC:7392 (D been passed in favour ofthe respondents on 19^'^ August,2013 whereby the suit ofthe respondents for possession has been decreed. According to hun, these petitions have now becomeinfhictuous.
Even otherwise,no one appears on behalfofthe petitioners when the matters are called.
The same are dismissed in default even otheiwise both having become infhictuous.
SINGH, NOVEMBER 18,2013/ka 2013:DHC:7392
JUDGMENT