Full Text
Translation output
••
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 63/2013 & CM 18964/2013
PARUL NAHAR ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Prakash Gautam, Mr.Vivek Ojha, Advocates
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 63/2013 & CM 18964/2013
PARUL NAHAR ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Prakash Gautam, Mr.Vivek Ojha, Advocates
VERSUS
SOUMITRA KUMAR NAHAR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate
Through: Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
29.11.2013 After some hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant sought liberty to withdraw the appeal.
The Court notices that on 1.3.2013 and 2.4.2013, the Division Bench of this Court had desired that the petition before the trial court should be concluded at the earliest, preferably within one year.
The trial court shall make all endeavours to adhere to the deadline and file an action taken report at the end ofthe period with its observations.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
NOVEMBER 29, 2013 RN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J...
2013:DHC:7111-DB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
29.11.2013 After some hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant sought liberty to withdraw the appeal.
The Court notices that on 1.3.2013 and 2.4.2013, the Division Bench of this Court had desired that the petition before the trial court should be concluded at the earliest, preferably within one year.
The trial court shall make all endeavours to adhere to the deadline and file an action taken report at the end ofthe period with its observations.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
NOVEMBER 29, 2013 RN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J...
2013:DHC:7111-DB
JUDGMENT