Shimalmalhotra v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 20 Nov 2013 · 2013:DHC:7065
Veena Birbal
BAIL APPLN. 2160/2013
2013:DHC:7065
criminal bail_granted

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing bond and surety, subject to cooperation with the investigation and joining as and when called.

Full Text
Translation output
/ $-27 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 2160/2013
SHIMALMALHOTRA Petitioner
Through. Mrs. Meena Kohli with Ms.Meenakshi Advs.
VERSUS
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent A Through: Mr.Yogesh Verma, APP
^ CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
20.11.2013
CRL.M.A. 17427/2013 (^exemption^
Exemption as prayed for is allowed, subject tojustexceptions.
BAIL APPT.N. 2160/2013
The allegations against the petitioner are that he had purchased a
ORDER

0 Maruti Esteem car No.HR-12 H-4047 from one Paramjit Singh Sethi. The R.C. ofthe car is still in the name ofParamjit Singh Sethi. It is submitted that the co-accused Sukh Chan had taken the car from the petitionerand had gone to Rajasthan. Further allegations are that the said Sukh Chan was found mpossession of28 boxes ofHquor. It is stated that co-accused Sukh Chan has already been granted bail by the learned sessions court. It is stated that Paramjit Singh Sethi has also been granted anticipatory bail by the learned sessions court. 2013:DHC:7065 Q Considering the totality of facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bond in the sum of ^15,000/- with surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of arresting officer/I.O. The petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called by the I.O. In case the petitioner does not join the investigation, the State will be at liberty to apply for cancellation ofanticipatoiy bail ofpetitioner. The application stands disposed of. Dasti. CRL.M.B. 23n2/2nn In view of above order, no orders are required on this application. The same stands disposed ofaccordingly, NOVEMBER 20,2013 srb VEENABIRBAL, J