Mithun Bharti v. The State

Delhi High Court · 16 Dec 2013 · 2013:DHC:7067
Veena Birbal
BAIL APPLN. 2359/2013
2013:DHC:7067
criminal appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's second anticipatory bail application in the same FIR due to lack of fresh grounds, while allowing exemption from personal appearance subject to exceptions.

Full Text
Translation output
/ $'^16 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 2359/2013
MITHUN BHARTI Petitioner
Through: Mr.Surinder Singh, Adv.
VERSUS
THE STATE Respondent
Through: Mr.Satish Kumar, APP.
Mr. Vivek Agarwal with Mr.Ankit Agarwal, Adv. for complainant.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
ORDER o/o 16.12.2013
CRL.M.A.18879/2013 (exemption)
Exemption as prayed for is allowed, subject to just exceptions.
BAIL APPLN. 2359/2013
This is the second anticipatory bail application ofthe petitioner in the same FIR. The earlier bail application was dismissed by this Court on
19.11.2013 by a detailed speaking order. No fresh grounds for anticipatory bail are made out.
The application is dismissed.
VEENA BIRBAL, J DECEMBER 16,2013 srb 2013:DHC:7067
JUDGMENT