Birender Singh & Anr. v. Jagdish Prasad Sharma & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 03 Dec 2013 · 2013:DHC:8492
Suresh Kait
MAC.APP. 172/2009
2013:DHC:8492
civil settled

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of two MAC appeals as settled following a Lok Adalat settlement involving payment of Rs. 1.20 lakhs to the respondent.

Full Text
Translation output
$-57 & 58 \l\jO HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MAC.APP. 172/2009
BIRENDER SINGH & ANR. Appellants Represented by: Mr. Hari Shankar, Adv.
VERSUS
JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA & ORS. Respondents Represented by: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Adv. for Rl.
Mr. Paritosh Budhiraja, Adv. for R2.
AND
MAC.APP. 175/2009
BIRENDER SINGH & ANR. Appellants Represented by: Mr. Hari Shanlcar, Adv.
VERSUS
LALLI DEVI & ORS. Respondents Represented by: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Adv. forRl.
Mr. Paritosh Budhiraja, Adv. for R2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
03.12.2013
ORDER

1. Vide order dated 07.10.2013, instant appeals were referred to the Lok Adalat for settlement. Vide order dated 23.11.2013, settlement has been arrived at between the parties as under: "The matter has been settled between the parties. The appellants and respondent no. 2 have agreed to pay a total sum of Rs.1.20 Lakhs to the respondent no. 1 in both the appeals. A sum of Rs.50,000/- stands deposited before the Court which the respondent no. 1 would be at liberty to withdraw. The appellants have paid a 2013:DHC:8492 sum ofRs.20,000/-to therespondent no. 1 in both the appeals today before the Lok Adalat. Learned counsel for the appellants states that the balance amount of Rs.20,000/- which is due in both the appeals will bepaid to the respondent no. 1on 3"^ December, 2013 when the matter is listed before the Court. Learned counselfor the respondent no. 2 states that the amount of Rs. 15,000/- in each of the appeals which the respondent no. 2 has topay in terms ofthesettlement will bepaid to the respondent no. 1 on 3'^December, 2013 in cash. "

2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has brought Rs.20,000/-, which has been handed over to the counsel for the respondent no. 1/claimant. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 2 has brought Rs.30,000/- and the same has also been handed over to the counsel appearing on behalfof respondent no. 1/claimant.

3. Registry is directed to release the statutory amount in favour of the /Q) respondent no. 1/ claimant in view ofthe order dated 23.1ll2013 passed by the Lok Adalat.

4. Accordingly, present appeals are disposed of as settled.

DECEMBER 03, 2013 jg SURE^ KAIT, J