Smiti-Dcline Beecpiam Ltd. & Anr v. Sunil Sarmalkar & Ors

Delhi High Court · 02 Dec 2013 · 2013:DHC:8574-DB
S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri
RFA (OS) 128/2012
2013:DHC:8574-DB
civil appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after the appellants ceased marketing and manufacturing activities related to the disputed trademark 'Paramax'.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RFA (OS) 128/2012, CM. APPL. 19997/2012
SMITI-DCLINE BEECPIAM LTD. & ANR Appellants Tlirough; Ms. Ayushi Kiran with
Mr. Bhagwati Prasad, Advocates.
VERSUS
SUNIL SARMALKAR & ORS.
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
02.12.2013 Respondents It is submitted that respondent nos.l, 2 & 3 are no longer marketing the goods under the mark 'Paramax' for the last seven years and since the fourth respondent has stopped manufacturing the saidproduct, indeed it has stopped •activities for the last five years, counsel submits, she has instructions to withdraw the appeal in the light of these developments.
RP'A (OS) 128/2012 is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending application.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J

DECEMBER 02, 2013 /vks/ AJMI WAZmi, J 2013:DHC:8574-DB
JUDGMENT