Full Text
Translation output
$-5,6,9 to 14 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 1284/2011
RAJAT CHAKRABORTY
Petitioner
Through:Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
W.P.(C) 1284/2011
RAJAT CHAKRABORTY
Petitioner
Through:Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
VERSUS
UOI AND ORS
Respondents
Through:Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Advocates for R.1.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6.
6.
Respondents
Through:Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Advocates for R.1.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6.
6.
W.P.(C) 1554/2011
. DEEPAK KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
UOI AND ORS
. DEEPAK KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
UOI AND ORS
VERSUS
Respondents
Through: Mr.B.V.Niren, Advocates for R.I.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
9.
Through: Mr.B.V.Niren, Advocates for R.I.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
9.
W.P.(C) 1555/2011
2013:DHC:7460 PUSHPA DEVI FULERA Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
UOI AND ORS
2013:DHC:7460 PUSHPA DEVI FULERA Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
UOI AND ORS
VERSUS
Respondents
Through; Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Advocates for R.1.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
Through; Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Advocates for R.1.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
W.P.(C) 1556/2011
MANISH GURUNG AND ANR Petitioners
Through: Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
MANISH GURUNG AND ANR Petitioners
Through: Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
VERSUS
UOI AND ORS
Respondents
Through: Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Advocates for R.I.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
Respondents
Through: Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Advocates for R.I.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
W.P.(C) 1557/2011
S ANDIP KUMAR P ATEL 2013:DHC:7460 UOI AND ORS
Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
S ANDIP KUMAR P ATEL 2013:DHC:7460 UOI AND ORS
Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
VERSUS
Respondents
Through; Mr.B.V. Niren, Advocate for R.I.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singhfor counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin KumarSaini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
Through; Mr.B.V. Niren, Advocate for R.I.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singhfor counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin KumarSaini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
W.P.(C) 1558/2011
SHABNAM
UOI AND ORS
Petitioner
Through; Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
SHABNAM
UOI AND ORS
Petitioner
Through; Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
VERSUS
Respondents
Through; Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Advocates for R.l.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
Through; Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Advocates for R.l.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
W.P.(C) 1559/2011
VIJAY THAKUR AND ANR Petitioners
Through; Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar 2013:DHC:7460
Kumar Jha, Advocates.
VIJAY THAKUR AND ANR Petitioners
Through; Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar 2013:DHC:7460
Kumar Jha, Advocates.
VERSUS
UOI AND ORS
Respondents
Through: Mr.B.V.Niren, Advocate for R.l.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
Respondents
Through: Mr.B.V.Niren, Advocate for R.l.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
W.P.(C) 1560/2011
SURENDER KUMAR AND ANR Petitioners
Through: Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
SURENDER KUMAR AND ANR Petitioners
Through: Mr.Rajesh Raina with Mr.Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocates.
VERSUS
UOI AND ORS
Respondent
Through: Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Advocates for R.I.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
Respondent
Through: Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr.Ravjyot Singh, Advocates for R.I.
Mr.A.Rasheed Qureshi, Advocate for R.2 & 3.
Mr.Sudeep Singh for counsel for Mr.Rajesh Dhir, Advocate for respondent.
Mr.Vipin Kumar Saini, Advocate for R.6/Kanak Developers.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN
11.12.2013 The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions seeks to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to file the civil suit, since
2013:DHC:7460 disputed question of facts are involved in these petitions. He also seeks an interim protection till the petitioners approach the civil court, for an appropriate relief
In these circumstances, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
The interim order passed by this Court on 9^^ March, 2011 shall continue till5^January, 2014. The order shall automatically come to an end on that date without any further directions from the Court.
The respondents are directed to convey the said direction to the concerned authorities.
One copy each of this order be given dasti to the p^ptfes under the signature ofthe Court Master.
V.K. JAIN, J DECEMBER 11, 2013 2013:DHC:7460
11.12.2013 The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions seeks to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to file the civil suit, since
2013:DHC:7460 disputed question of facts are involved in these petitions. He also seeks an interim protection till the petitioners approach the civil court, for an appropriate relief
In these circumstances, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
The interim order passed by this Court on 9^^ March, 2011 shall continue till5^January, 2014. The order shall automatically come to an end on that date without any further directions from the Court.
The respondents are directed to convey the said direction to the concerned authorities.
One copy each of this order be given dasti to the p^ptfes under the signature ofthe Court Master.
V.K. JAIN, J DECEMBER 11, 2013 2013:DHC:7460
JUDGMENT