Full Text
J
Through: Mr A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr Deepak R. Dahiya, Adv.
VETSUS
NETAJI SUBFIASH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ..... Respondent
Through: Mr V.K. fandon, Adv.
JUDGMENT
1. Mr 'fandon has reverted with instructions fiorn his client,ri.e., thc respondent. He says that based on a request made by the appellant on 06.12.2013 to include in the pending arbitration proceedings, its supplementary claims as well, the respondent has indicated its consent to thc salne. This approval has been obtained, according to Mr Tandon, vide note dated II.12.2013, which is set out on the communication dated 06.12.2013 itself. As a matter of fact, the respondcnt has also referred its counter clairns to the arbitrator.
2. Mr Singla, leamed senior counsel for the appellanl, says that thc aforesaid stand of the respondent being in place, hc does not wish to prcss the captioned appeal any further. ARB.A. 1312012 pase I of 2 2013:DHC:8312
3. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the respondent to make a fonnal reference in terms of what is indicated hereinabove. 2,,*llJ)v,,: RAJIV SHAKDHER, J I DECEMBER I[2],2OI[3] kk