Full Text
Translation output
$-1
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DFXHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT.APP. (F.C.) 47/2013
CM APPL.16218, 16219 & 16220/2013
MR RAMAN NARULA Appellant
Through: Mr. Sunder Khatri, Advocate.
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DFXHI AT NEW DELHI
MAT.APP. (F.C.) 47/2013
CM APPL.16218, 16219 & 16220/2013
MR RAMAN NARULA Appellant
Through: Mr. Sunder Khatri, Advocate.
VERSUS
MRS HIMANI Respondent
Through: Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate.
COIMM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
% 12.12.2013
After some hearing, learned counsel for the appellant sought liberty to withdraw the appeal. He, however, stated that Court may consider granting some reasonable time to the appellant to pay amount against monthly due (i.e. Rs.8500/- per month) constituting the difference between the amount paid, i.e., Rs.6500/- per month and the amount ordered, i.e., Rs.15,000/- for the period commencing
20.11.2009 till the date of the impugned order, i.e., 3.6.2013.
This Court does not find any infirmity with the order of the
Irial Court fixing the maintenance @ Rs.15,000/- per month to the respondent wife for herself and for the upkeep ofthe minor daughter.
Iheliability, ofcourse, would be for the period commencing from the
2013:DHC:7890-DB
,1/ date when the appheation was filed, i.e., 20.09.2009 since the husband was concededly paying maintenance quantified atRs.6500/- under Section 125 proceedings as on that day, the balance, i.e., Rs.8500/- per month for the said period would have to be paid by the husband. The Court hereby directs that the same be cleared within six months from today subject to the further condition that said arrears would be paid in llill on or before 31.05.2014; the appellant shall clear entire arrears by paying three equal two monthly instalments to the respondent wife. The 'frial Court shall ensure compliance with these directions.
Ihe appeal is permitted to be withdrawn but subject to the above directions along with the pending applications.
DECEMBER 12, 2013
/vks/
S. KAVINDI^ BHAT, J
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
2013:DHC:7890-DB
Through: Mr. Naresh Sharma, Advocate.
COIMM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
% 12.12.2013
After some hearing, learned counsel for the appellant sought liberty to withdraw the appeal. He, however, stated that Court may consider granting some reasonable time to the appellant to pay amount against monthly due (i.e. Rs.8500/- per month) constituting the difference between the amount paid, i.e., Rs.6500/- per month and the amount ordered, i.e., Rs.15,000/- for the period commencing
20.11.2009 till the date of the impugned order, i.e., 3.6.2013.
This Court does not find any infirmity with the order of the
Irial Court fixing the maintenance @ Rs.15,000/- per month to the respondent wife for herself and for the upkeep ofthe minor daughter.
Iheliability, ofcourse, would be for the period commencing from the
2013:DHC:7890-DB
,1/ date when the appheation was filed, i.e., 20.09.2009 since the husband was concededly paying maintenance quantified atRs.6500/- under Section 125 proceedings as on that day, the balance, i.e., Rs.8500/- per month for the said period would have to be paid by the husband. The Court hereby directs that the same be cleared within six months from today subject to the further condition that said arrears would be paid in llill on or before 31.05.2014; the appellant shall clear entire arrears by paying three equal two monthly instalments to the respondent wife. The 'frial Court shall ensure compliance with these directions.
Ihe appeal is permitted to be withdrawn but subject to the above directions along with the pending applications.
DECEMBER 12, 2013
/vks/
S. KAVINDI^ BHAT, J
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
2013:DHC:7890-DB
JUDGMENT