Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. v. Mithilesh and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 17 Jan 2014 · 2014:DHC:274
Suresh Kait
MAC.APP No.985 /2013
2014:DHC:274
civil other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed the compensation award and remanded the motor accident claim for fresh inquiry after the Tribunal failed to frame an issue on negligence.

Full Text
Translation output
MAC.APP No.985 /2013 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 17th January, 2014 MAC. APP. No.985 /2013 & CM Nos.17248/2012 & 854/2014
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate.
Versus
SMT MITHILESH AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Kamal Deep, Advocate for
Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)
MAC.APP. 985/2013

1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant/Insurance Company impugns the award dated 06.08.2013, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.21,58,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of DAR till realization of the amount.

2. The only ground taken in the instant appeal is that the appellant/Insurance Company made a legal offer for an amount of Rs.9,94,104/-, but the same was not accepted by the LRs of the deceased. 2014:DHC:274

3. Vide order dated 27.09.2012, the learned Tribunal has framed the following issues:-

II. Relief.”

4. Learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company submitted that the learned Tribunal has not framed any issue pertaining to the negligence on the part of the offending vehicle involved in the accident.

5. Pursuant to order dated 30.10.2013, learned counsel named above appeared on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and submitted that he has no objection if the instant appeal is remanded back for fresh enquiry after framing proper issues.

6. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 06.08.2013 is hereby quashed.

7. Consequently, the matter is remanded back to the concerned Tribunal, who shall frame proper issues and make inquiry accordingly. Thereafter, proper opportunity shall be given to both parties to lead their evidence.

8. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Tribunal on 04.02.2014 for directions.

9. This Court expects from the learned Tribunal to decide the claim petition expeditiously.

10. Statutory amount be released in favour of the appellant/Insurance Company. CM Nos.17248/2012 (for stay) & 854/2014 (for directions) In view of the aforenoted order passed in appeal, both these applications have become infructuous. The same are accordingly disposed of. A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties.

SURESH KAIT, J. JANUARY 17, 2014 sb