Monica Malik v. Amit Malik

Delhi High Court · 28 Mar 2014 · 2014:DHC:1757
Valmiki J. Mehta
TR.P(C) No.26/2014
2014:DHC:1757
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of civil cases under Section 24 CPC, holding that mere convenience or proximity is insufficient ground for transfer and that transfer should not prejudice ongoing trials.

Full Text
Translation output
T.R.P (C) 26/2014
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TR.P(C) No.26/2014 28th March, 2014 MRS. MONICA MALIK ......Petitioner
Through: Ms. Gurmeet Bindra, Advocate.
VERSUS
MR. AMIT MALIK ...... Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. There is no merit in the petition under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for various reasons inasmuch as neither pleadings of the cases which are proposed to be transferred have been filed, and nor the common questions of law and fact in the two cases have been stated. More importantly, the basic ground seeking transfer under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is only the convenience of a party i.e petitioner herein. 2014:DHC:1757 T.R.P (C) 26/2014

2. Merely because now there are more than one district courts in Delhi, and that one of the district courts is nearer than other district court, the same is not a ground for invoking or exercising powers under Section 24 CPC. If the prayer of the petitioner is allowed, then, consolidation of cases will prejudice trial of the earlier case which is at an advanced stage.

3. Dismissed.

MARCH 28, 2014 VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J Ne