Subhash Chand and Anr. v. The Financial Commissioner and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 21 Aug 2014 · 2014:DHC:4037
Suresh Kait
W.P.(C) 1579/2013
2014:DHC:4037
civil petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to supply certified copies of judicial orders and case records to petitioners to enable compliance with earlier directions, allowing the petition and cancelling the hearing date.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P. (C) 1579/2013
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 21st August, 2014
W.P.(C) 1579/2013
SUBHASH CHAND AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate.
Versus
THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Represented by: Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Mr. Nishant Gautam Gupta and Mr.Anshul
Khatri, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)
W.P.(C) 1579/2013

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners are seeking directions to supply the certified copy of the order dated 27.09.1990 along with complete proceedings and pleadings of case No.883/SDM/RA/KWC enabling them to comply with the directions dated 11.12.2012 passed by the respondent No. 1 in case No.402/2012, regarding Khasra No.101 (4-

16) vested in Gaon Sabha Ibrahimpur, Delhi, which was fixed for 28.03.2013.

2. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has undertaken that whatever the record regarding 2014:DHC:4037 W.P. (C) 1579/2013 proceedings as noted above will be available with the respondent Nos. 1 to 4, the same shall be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of six weeks from today.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cost has been paid. Hence, the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 is taken on record.

4. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, the instant petition is allowed.

5. The date already fixed before the Registrar, i.e., 25.08.2014 stands cancelled. CM No.8512/2014 With the disposal of the petition itself, the instant application has become infructuous. The same is accordingly dismissed.

SURESH KAIT (JUDGE) AUGUST 21, 2014 sb