M/S SAFFRON PROMOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED v. Union of India & Ors

Delhi High Court · 03 Nov 2014 · 2014:DHC:5692-DB
Badar Durrez Ahmed; V. Kameswar Rao
W.P.(C) 5983/2014
2014:DHC:5692-DB
property petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years of the award.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) No. 5983/2014 34(I)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 03.11.2014
W.P.(C) 5983/2014
M/S SAFFRON PROMOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED ... Petitioner
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr Bharat Beriwal For the Respondents : Mr Pawan Mathur for R-4/DDA.
Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for R-2&3/L&B & LAC.
Mr Anil Soni with Mr Naginder Benipal for R-1.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
JUDGMENT
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL)

1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 2013 Act’) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter 2014:DHC:5692-DB referred to as ‘the 1894 Act’) and in respect of which Award No.15/1987- 88 dated 05.06.1987 was made, inter alia, in respect of the petitioner’s land comprised in Khasra Nos. 1310 (4-06), 1611(4-04) and 1612/2(3-10) measuring 12 bighas in Village Chattarpur shall be deemed to have lapsed.

2. It is an admitted position that neither physical possession of the subject lands has been taken by the land acquiring agency, nor has any compensation been paid to the petitioner. The award was made more than five years prior to the commencement of the 2013 Act. All the ingredients of section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as interpreted by the Supreme Court and this Court in the following decisions stand satisfied:-

(i) Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr v.

(ii) Union of India and Ors v. Shiv Raj and Ors:

(iii) Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association v.

(iv) Surinder Singh vs. Union of India and Ors.:

(v) Gyanender Singh and Others v. Union of India and Others: WP(C) 1393/2014 decided on 23.09.2014

3. As a result the petitioner is entitled to a declaration that the said acquisition proceedings initiated under the 1894 Act in respect of the subject lands are deemed to have lapsed. It is so declared.

4. The writ petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent. There shall be no order as to costs.

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

NOVEMBER 3, 2014 SR