Deepak Kumar and Ors. v. Sashastra Seema Bal & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 25 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:2698-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul
W.P.(C) 626/2024
2025:DHC:2698-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous after the disputed candidate was recruited, resolving the petitioners' grievance.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 626/2024 & CM APPL. 32463/2024, CM APPL.
60540/2024, CM APPL. 60546/2024 DEEPAK KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ankit Chauhan, Ms. Sazia, Mr. Vatsalya Shukla and Mr. Pratyaksh Sikodia, Advs.
VERSUS
SASHASTRA SEEMA BAL & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey CGSC, Ms. Archana GP , Ms. Gurleen Kaur
Waraich and Mr. Kritarth Upadhyay, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL O R D E R (ORAL)
16.04.2025
JUDGMENT

1. Learned Counsel for the parties are ad idem that the sole candidate with respect to whom there was a discrepancy as noted in the order dated 25 March 2025 has also been recruited.

2. As such, the grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition stands assuaged.

3. The writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed of.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.