Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
MUMTAZ ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.M.A.Khan, Adv. alongwith petitioner in person.
Represented by: Mohd. Suhail, Adv.
C.M.No.19414/2014 (for recording settlement)
1. Vide instant application the applicant/petitioner has prayed to record the settlement in terms of the settlement dated 18.10.2014.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that during the pendency of the petition, the petitioner and respondent No.2 have amicably settled the matter for a lump sum amount of Rs.[2] lac.
3. Learned counsel for the parties submits that Rs.[1] lac is lying with the Registry pursuance to the order dated 23.09.2014 and Rs.[1] lac in cash has been handed over to the respondent No.2 today itself, who is present in the 2014:DHC:6572 Court and has accepted Rs. 1 lac in cash without any protest.
4. As agreed by respondent No.2, the applicant/petitioner and respondent No.2 shall move appropriate petition for quashing the FIR No.295/2013 registered under Section 304A IPC at P.S.Jamia Nagar and get the same quashed.
5. In view of the above, the application is allowed.
6. Registry is directed to release the amount of Rs. 1 lac with interest accrued thereon, if any, in favour of respondent No.2 on taking steps by him.
7. It is made clear that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the respondent No.2 shall co-operate with the petitioner in getting the aforementioned FIR quashed and if he failed to do so, he shall be liable to repay the amount of Rs.[2] lac received by him.
8. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as being settled between the parties.
9. The date already fixed i.e. 08.12.2014 stands cancelled.
10. Dasti.
SURESH KAIT, J DECEMBER 01, 2014 mr