Mahavir Prasad & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 04 Dec 2014 · 2014:DHC:6716
Sunil Gaur
LA.APP. 568/2011
2014:DHC:6716
property appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for land acquisition to ₹21 lakhs per acre following a Supreme Court precedent but denied interest for delay in payment.

Full Text
Translation output
LA.APP No.568/2011 Page 1 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: December 04, 2014
LA.APP. 568/2011 & C.M.No.12408/2014
MAHAVIR PRASAD & ORS. ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. N. S. Negi, Advocate
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI
Mr. Kunal Sharma, Mr. Abhishek Rai Singh & Ms. Sriti Bisoi, Advocate for respondent No.2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
Impugned judgment grants compensation @`15 lacs per acre with consequential benefits for Block ‘A’ land situated in village Bharthal, Delhi to appellants, in pursuance to Notification of 13th December, 2000 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act.
At the hearing of this appeal, learned counsel for appellant has placed reliance upon Apex Court’s decision of 13th February, 2014 in Civil Appeal No. 2091/2014, titled as Impulse India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & ors. wherein the compensation for Block ‘A’ acquired lands to similarly situated claimants has been increased to `21 lacs per acre.
2014:DHC:6716 LA.APP No.568/2011 Page 2 Since none appears on behalf of first respondent, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate, present in the Court has been called upon to appear on behalf of respondent-UoI and he submits that on parity basis, appellants are entitled to compensation @`21 lacs per acre with consequential benefits but for the period of delay of 998 days, appellants are not entitled to the interest amount.
This appeal is allowed in terms of Apex Court’s decision in
Impulse India (Supra) and appellants are granted compensation @ `21 lacs per acre with consequential benefits while denying interest for the period of delay of 998 days.
This appeal and application are disposed of in aforesaid terms.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
DECEMBER 04, 2014 r 2014:DHC:6716