Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
CHANDER WATI .... Petitioner
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr Deepak Khosla For the Respondent No.1 : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi
For the Respondent No.2 : Mr Pawan Mathur
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 2013 Act’) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 1894 Act’) and in respect of which Award No. 14/1987-88 dated 26.05.1987 was 2014:DHC:6845-DB made, inter alia, in respect of the petitioner’s land comprised in khasra No. 7/21 measuring 1 bigha 182 biswas in village Satbari shall be deemed to have lapsed.
2. It is an admitted position that neither physical possession of the subject lands has been taken by the land acquiring agency, nor has any compensation been paid to the petitioner. The award was made more than five years prior to the commencement of the 2013 Act. All the ingredients of section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as interpreted by the Supreme Court and this Court in the following decisions stand satisfied:-
(i) Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr v.
(ii) Union of India and Ors v. Shiv Raj and Ors:
(iii) Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors: Civil Appeal NO. 8700/2013 decided on 10.09.2014;
(iv) Surender Singh v. Union of India & Others: WP(C)
2294/2014 decided on 12.09.2014 by this Court. Corrected by virtue of order dated 02.07.2015 Corrected by virtue of order dated 02.07.2015
3. As a result the petitioner is entitled to a declaration that the said acquisition proceedings initiated under the 1894 Act in respect of the subject lands are deemed to have lapsed. It is so declared.
4. The writ petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent. There shall be no order as to costs.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J DECEMBER 08, 2014 SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J SR