Shri Jai Prakash v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 23 Dec 2014 · 2014:DHC:7376-DB
Badar Durrez Ahmed; I.S. Mehta
W.P.(C) 7444/2014
2014:DHC:7376-DB
property petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act without possession or compensation for over five years before the 2013 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

Full Text
Translation output
WP(C) 7444/2014
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 23.12.2014
W.P.(C) 7444/2014 & CM 17664/2014
SHRI JAI PRAKASH & ANR. ..... Petitioners
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana For the Respondent Nos. 1&2 : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi
For the Respondent No.3/DDA : Mr Sajeev Sabharwal
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA
JUDGMENT
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL)

1. By way of this writ petition the petitioners are seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 2013 Act’) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioners, consequently, seek a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated 2014:DHC:7376-DB under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 1894 Act’) and in respect of which Award No.8/1991-92 dated 06.02.1992 was made, inter alia, in respect of the petitioners’ land comprised in Khasra NO. 645 measuring 4 bighas 16 biswas in village Siraspur, Delhi, shall be deemed to have lapsed.

2. It is an admitted position that neither physical possession of the subject lands has been taken by the land acquiring agency, nor has any compensation been paid to the petitioners. The award was made more than five years prior to the commencement of the 2013 Act. All the ingredients of section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as interpreted by the Supreme Court and this Court in the following decisions stand satisfied:-

(i) Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr v.

(ii) Union of India and Ors v. Shiv Raj and Ors:

(iii) Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association v. State of Tamil Nadu and Ors: Civil Appeal NO. 8700/2013 decided on 10.09.2014;

(iv) Surender Singh vs. Union of India and Ors.:

3. As a result the petitioners are entitled to a declaration that the said acquisition proceedings initiated under the 1894 Act in respect of the subject lands are deemed to have lapsed. It is so declared.

4. The writ petition is allowed to the aforesaid extent. There shall be no order as to costs.

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J I.S. MEHTA, J DECEMBER 23, 2014 kb